Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In many countries the argue often rising that professionals like doctors, engineers should prioritize to do work in the country where did get their training. and some people argue that they should experience their feild from any where in the world.

There are two main reasons why professionalers prefer go to outside for working after study, first is some countries has not give better finance another might be to get further experience. because internationally these education sector have huge respect as training for next generation and working with international scientis which broader the knowledge about the feild also make new technology for country. so that is why its a great to get further experience to work another country. and also this make great future for their country as to trained with high experience.

From a broader perpective, this desire that these professinalers should work in the country where they get kknowlege, Although its a great thing to expanded their nation first, i withstand with this view, while this situation can be best when homecountry provide best technology facilities that to make something new and trained their next genration, so its completely depands on their good governecs. and it is great way when a scientis go to out for work means they will get further knowledge and after returned to their country they will highly benefit for nation.

In the conclusion, professinalers like doctors and engineers are very important for aa country strenght so these professinalers should go to another country after study for further knowledge and after that they should work only their nation and to make country great with their experience.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both perspectives: the first body paragraph gives reasons professionals may work abroad, while the next considers the case for serving their home country. Your own view is also present, especially in the conclusion, where you support gaining experience overseas before returning. However, the position is not consistently clear: “i withstand with this view” is difficult to interpret, and the essay does not clearly explain whether professionals should be required to return or simply encouraged to do so. Several points, such as better finances, experience, and benefits to the nation, are introduced but not developed with specific explanations or examples. State your position directly and extend each main reason with a clear example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion, and the broad sequence—from working abroad to serving the home country—is understandable. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because several ideas are joined in long, loosely connected sentences. For example, the first body paragraph moves from finances to experience, education, international scientists, and new technology without clearly showing how each point relates to the next. Connectors such as “and also,” “so that is why,” and “Although” are sometimes repetitive or used in ways that do not clarify the relationship between ideas. Give each paragraph a clear central point, then use shorter sentences and precise linking phrases to develop it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “further experience,” “technology,” “knowledge,” and “benefit for nation,” so the reader can identify the main subject. However, the range is limited and many spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make parts of the response difficult to understand. Examples include “professionalers,” “feild,” “perpective,” and “good governecs”; these errors recur rather than appearing as isolated slips. Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “prioritize to do work” and “make great future.” Build accuracy alongside range by learning common academic collocations and checking spelling and word forms. More precise wording would help you express the contrast between professional freedom and national responsibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional idea about home-country facilities and a sentence beginning “Although.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors in sentence formation and punctuation sometimes make the intended meaning hard to follow. For instance, “some countries has not give better finance” has problems with subject–verb agreement and verb form, while “where did get their training” is missing a clear subject. Several sentences begin with lowercase letters or are joined with full stops and conjunctions inappropriately, as in “and some people argue…” and “because internationally…”. Practise building complete sentences with clear subjects and verbs, then check agreement, tense, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.