Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-06
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
some people believes that professionals such as doctor and engineers , should be required to work where they did their training while some people think that they can work anywhere where they want to do there work.This easy will discuss both the view and explain my why i believe professional can work wherever they want.
On the one hand, people think that it is important to work where they are trained for there job because of the several reasons. Among them one of the main reasons is that if the country provides them education bases on there countries money and after completing there education if the children immediately moves to abroad then the country faces loss because there may be lack of professional doctors or engineers.
On the other hand, people believe that the professionals doctor and engineer can work freely where they want to do because some countries offer them better salaries,some will offer good facilities than the other.They can get the life the want to live in another country.for example,if the doctors move to abroad than they get better facilities better environment and than they get to know some more information which they can shared with there colluges while they return to there home country.
In my opinion, it is not important to work where they are trained professional can work freely where they want to work because by joing different country groups they can improve their skills they learn new things and they also encourage other people to do the same work
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both views and state your position: the first body paragraph explains that a country may lose trained professionals, while the second gives reasons to work abroad, including better pay and facilities. Your opinion that professionals should be free to choose is also clear in the introduction and conclusion. However, the discussion remains limited and some points are not fully explained. For example, the claim that professionals can share knowledge with colleagues “while they return” is not developed, and the conclusion mainly repeats the freedom-to-work view rather than weighing it against the country’s need for staff. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make your final judgement more fully supported.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding opinion. The signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers identify the contrast. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several ideas are joined in long, loosely connected sentences. In the second body paragraph, the points about salaries, facilities, living conditions, and sharing information run together without clear development. References such as “they” and “there” can also make it difficult to identify exactly who or what is meant. Use shorter, more clearly organised sentences and connect each supporting point explicitly to the paragraph’s main idea.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “professionals,” “education,” “salaries,” “facilities,” and “skills,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms are inaccurate, sometimes making the reader pause. Examples include “This easy” for the essay, “education bases on there countries money,” and “colluges.” Phrases such as “work freely where they want to do” are also awkward and repetitive. Build a more precise set of expressions for discussing migration and public investment, and check spelling and word forms carefully. More accurate collocations would make your arguments clearer and more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and longer sentences, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, the range of structures is limited, and errors occur frequently, particularly in subject–verb agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries. For instance, “some people believes” should use a plural verb, while “the professionals doctor and engineer” has an unclear singular/plural pattern. The opening sentence also combines several clauses without reliable punctuation, and “they can shared” uses an incorrect verb form. Practise building accurate sentences with one main idea and a supporting clause, then check agreement and verb forms. More consistent control would reduce the effort required to understand your points.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.