Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

This essay argues that some people beleive that professionals such as docters and engineer should have obligatory to work and train in their home country to gain more practical experience while other beleive that it is not be necessary for them to work in country the should be independent to choose to whether they work in the country or abroad. from my prespective second opinion has outweighs more advantages than disadvantages.

Those who are experienced in their feild and completed their studies like doctors and engineers now they become professionals they completed their studies in their home country but for jobs and training either they continue to work in the country or out of country. in my opinion this decision should be on the graduate depending on their circumstances whether professionals afford the travelling and different expensess. For instances the docter in medical professional have high scores but for training he did not have financial affordability so for them te best option is to do trained in his feild and get high pay job in the country. The professionals definately continue to train abroad becuse of the vast opportunaty and jobs.

Another major significant is they knew about different cultures and languages and attract with different people having different background. In this regard,this boost their confidence and also gave them global experience.

Government should focus on te cause why students leave country at greater proportion for instance if a docter leave country, in their absence the communities suffer and eventually face lose. so i beleive authorities should work on the drawbacks to improve conditions for the graduates to live here. if their is high opportunity available and have good circumstances graduates not leave their country and try their best and work hard in their home town.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state a preference for professionals to choose where they work, while also recognising the concern that a country may lose doctors and other skilled workers. The point about overseas work offering broader opportunities and exposure to different cultures is relevant. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the first view is not clearly explained as an argument for requiring graduates to serve the country that trained them, and the example about a doctor’s finances is difficult to follow. Your position is also expressed unclearly in the opening, and the final paragraph shifts towards government action without fully connecting this to your view. Explain each side more directly and support your opinion with a clearer example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: the opening introduces the debate, the next paragraph discusses graduates’ choices, and a later paragraph gives a reason to work abroad before the conclusion turns to the effects of professionals leaving. However, the progression is not consistently clear, and the two sides are not separated or developed in a balanced sequence. Several sentences combine multiple points, making relationships hard to follow, particularly the opening and the sentence beginning “For instances the docter…”. Linking phrases such as “In this regard” and “Another major significant” are either awkward or do not clearly show how the ideas connect. Use one focused paragraph for each view, then a conclusion, and make each paragraph’s main point explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “practical experience,” “global experience,” “opportunity,” and “communities suffer.” These choices show an effort to discuss professional training and migration. However, the range is limited and several spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make parts of the argument difficult to understand, such as “have obligatory,” “financial affordability,” and “attract with different people.” Repetition of “country,” “professionals,” and “work” also limits precision. Choose more natural topic-specific expressions and check spelling carefully; for example, describe a country as requiring graduates to “complete a period of service,” and refer to “financial constraints” rather than “financial affordability.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses with “while,” “whether,” and “if,” but complex structures are often faulty and errors occur frequently enough to make some meanings unclear. For example, “it is not be necessary for them to work in country” has an incorrect verb construction and missing article, while “this decision should be on the graduate” does not form a clear grammatical pattern. There are also problems with agreement and verb forms, as in “this boost their confidence” and “graduates not leave their country.” Sentence boundaries and capitalisation are inconsistent, especially after full stops. Practise building shorter, complete sentences first, then add subordinate clauses while checking verb forms, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.