Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

they should live in native country and help people, it will help nations government can

Some individuals think that high qualified people, for instance doctors and engineers, should work in the nation where they graduates and completed education. While, others think they can work in any country where they desire to do. This essay will discuss both views and also my relevant opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.

The first and foremost, professionals should stay in country where they get thier education and help their people who are belong to their country. To elaborate, many countries have well developed collages and schools, although they have not enough doctors and engineers because they move abroad due to lack of opportunities in native place. Therefore, doctors should take responsibilites to provide medical attention towards native people. Moreover, in some regions individuals often suffer from poor infrastructure. If engineers stay and help to the government in better development then it will directly beneficial not only people but also their authority.

On the other hand, many doctors and engineers have good potantial anopportunities to make better their career. To explain, in some places demand of qualified people is very high. Therefore, they should move abroad and get high sallary, as a result they can live a luxurious life and also financially support their family. In addition, few nations has suffer from poor medical system. Thereby, doctors should move thier and aid people who geniounly needed medical attention.

To conclude and my opinion is, both views are depend on different circumstances. In some countries, medical and infrastructure development is poor and they need more professionals so, doctors and engineers should shift their and help people. However, they should also help their native people who belongs to their native place and stay there.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views: the first body paragraph argues that professionals should serve their home country, while the second explains why they may seek better career prospects and pay abroad. Your conclusion also attempts to state a position, but it remains unclear because it supports both options without explaining when one should take priority. The ideas are relevant, yet they are often asserted rather than developed. For example, you mention shortages of doctors and engineers and poor infrastructure, but provide no specific illustration or explanation of how requiring graduates to stay would work. Clarify your own view and develop each argument with a concrete example or a fuller explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps readers identify the main sections of your discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and linking expressions can feel mechanical or inaccurate. For instance, “The first and foremost” and “To explain” introduce points without always making the relationship between them clear; “Thereby” is also an awkward link to the claim that doctors should move abroad. The conclusion repeats both sides rather than bringing the discussion to a clear resolution. Use fewer formulaic transitions, connect each example directly to its claim, and make the final paragraph state a consistent position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “medical attention,” “infrastructure,” “qualified people,” and “career,” so the reader can follow the general subject. However, the range is limited and several noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “high qualified,” “make better their career,” “high sallary,” and “people who geniounly needed.” Some expressions, such as “their authority,” are also imprecise in context. Aim to learn common word partnerships and check spelling carefully. More precise phrases such as “highly qualified professionals,” “advance their careers,” and “earn a higher salary” would make your arguments clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “although,” “because,” and “if.” This shows an effort to vary sentence structure, but complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some ideas harder to follow. For example, “many countries have well developed collages and schools, although they have not enough doctors” has an unclear contrast and problematic clause construction. There are also agreement and verb-form errors in “few nations has suffer” and “both views are depend.” Articles and sentence boundaries need attention as well. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and review each sentence for a complete, logically connected clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.