Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some people say that professionals like doctors and engineers should be obliged to work in the country where they completed their training, while others argue that they should be allowed to work anywhere in the world. This essay will discuss both views and I agree with the former.
On the one hand, it is a common debate that some professionals including doctors and engineers should serve in the country they got their qualifications from. I agree with the argument because some professions, especially medical, requires not only skills and training but also dedication and devotion. It requires long shifts and tiring schedules, which a person can never offer if he is not dedicated. Consider a doctor working in his homeland, he can understand the sufferings of patients, their circumustances and can also suggest diet and cautions better than a foreign professional who knows less about the culture and environment. Additionally, the country invests in training its professionals, specifically if they get their degree from a public sector institution, and it requires to be paid back.
On the other hand, poponents of professional freedom argue that doctors and engineers should be allowed to work anywhere they want. This is mainly due to financial choices and career development. Everyone has a right to choose what works best for them. For instance, any person will prefer a high rewarding job in terms of money and career growth over a low rewarding. Some countries offer better professional and personal benefits in certain professions than others. This can be sorted by providing doctors and engineers with better paying jobs and opportunities for career development in their own country.
In conclusion, professionals should prefer working in the same country they had their training in, provided that they are given equal chances to learn and earn as another country would be providing. Professional growth and financial benefits should not be compromised.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the debate and state a clear preference for requiring professionals to serve where they trained. The reasons are relevant: you mention cultural understanding in patient care and the public investment involved in training. You also explain why professionals may seek work abroad, referring to pay and career development, and your conclusion restates your position with a condition about comparable opportunities at home. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The case for compulsory service relies partly on the broad claim that dedication is needed, while the freedom argument is explained more briefly. Develop each point with a specific example or clearer reasoning, and distinguish more carefully between encouraging service and legally requiring it.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow, and the contrast between the arguments is apparent. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some stronger control through purposeful paragraphing and a consistent line of discussion. At times, however, linking feels formulaic, and some connections between claims could be made more explicit. For example, the move from cultural understanding to public investment in the first body paragraph is abrupt. Use transitions that show how each reason supports your position, and clarify references such as “This can be sorted” by naming the problem being addressed.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range for the topic, including terms such as “career development,” “professional freedom,” “public sector institution,” and “financial benefits.” These choices help communicate the main arguments, and attempts at more formal vocabulary are evident. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, though, such as “high rewarding job,” “got their qualifications from,” and “it requires to be paid back.” There are also spelling errors, including “circumustances” and “poponents.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and polish. Check spelling carefully and learn common word partnerships; for instance, use “well-paid position” and “repay the investment” rather than translating phrases literally.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional clause in “provided that they are given equal chances” and a relative clause in “a foreign professional who knows less about the culture.” Most sentences communicate their meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. In “some professions, especially medical, requires,” the subject and verb do not agree, and “medical” needs a suitable noun or adjective construction. “Everyone has a right” would normally be “Everyone has the right,” while “it requires to be paid back” has an incorrect grammatical pattern. The sentence beginning “Consider a doctor working…” is also a fragment. Review agreement, articles, and complete sentence structure, while continuing to use varied clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.