Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the modern era, certain individuals assume that professionals experts like doctors and enginners , have to work in the nation where they complated their study. Whereas, others argue that they can work wherever they want even in abraod if they want to . I believe with latter statement and my justification will be provided in the upcoming paragraphs along with relevant examples.

To begin with , there are plenty of reason why such professionals should work in abroad if they wish . One of the predominently reason is sometimes other nation provid better opportunity in terms of carrer growth and income . To, articulate , sometimes this country from where this experts complated thier study can not provide better salary or can not give much carrer growth as they capeble of .Therefore, they should go to other nations, to live confortable lives . Another reasson major is this nation where this experts complated thier training , can not affored to provide funds for thier research . Due to , they should where other goverment institue capeble to give fouds to thier research . As a result , they professinals might inventent something via this researches because of provided funds . For example, In USA , invite this professionals from other nation to work thier and provid funding on research they are doing . Therfore , this professionals get opportunity do something .

On the other hand , it is very crusical for this professionals to do thier work where they complated thier training because it is kind a tribute for tham to the nation where they finished there study . To elaborate , goverments invest much amount money to public to provide better education and high-level training .Therfore , professionals should contibute to the development to thecountry that supported that . For examples, many nations have shortage of doctors and enginners and if this profeesinals move aborad after thier study , it would be nafativley affect to the social development .

In conclusion, although , professionals like doctors and enginners have to work in the country where they complated thier training becasue it would be unfair to nation because that nation provided better education , and if this professionals want to leave this could affect that nation badly in terms of social developement . However, i believe that professionals should go to abroad becasue where they gobal exposure and might get higher income . In addition , some country provide funding to this professionals to do reserach ,so this may help this expert in thier future .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the question and state your position clearly: you support professionals being free to work abroad. The two main arguments are relevant: overseas work may offer better career prospects and research funding, while remaining at home could repay public investment and help countries facing shortages. The USA example also supports your point about funding. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others. For instance, the claim that working abroad enables professionals to “live comfortable lives” is asserted rather than explained, and the example about the USA is broad and unclear. Develop each argument with a specific explanation or example, and make the conclusion more concise so it reinforces your position without repeating the opposing view at length.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. This makes the discussion easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with” and “On the other hand” show the shift between arguments. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, with repeated transitions such as “To elaborate” and “As a result,” and some links between ideas are unclear. For example, “Due to, they should where other government institute capable to give funds” does not clearly connect the funding problem to the proposed solution. References such as “this professionals” and “this nation” also make it harder to identify exactly who or which country is meant. Use clearer sentence-to-sentence links and more precise references.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “career growth,” “research,” “funding,” “tribute,” and “social development.” These choices show an effort to discuss professional opportunities and national needs. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause, as in “enginners,” “complated,” “predominently,” and “nafativley.” Several phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “work in abroad,” “provide funds,” and “do something” when describing research outcomes. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations as complete phrases, such as “work abroad,” “fund research,” and “contribute to national development.” This would make your ideas clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “where,” and “if.” This gives you some variety, and the main meaning is generally recoverable. However, some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “professionals experts … have to work” has an unnecessary noun structure, while “they should go to other nations, to live” has awkward clause construction and punctuation. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “government invest much amount money” and “this professionals might invent.” Aim to form complete, controlled sentences before adding extra clauses, and check subject–verb agreement, articles, plurals, and punctuation. More accurate complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.