Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argued that professionals, such as doctor and engineers,should be required to work in the country where they did their training; in contrast, other individuals contend that they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Scrutinizing both views,I,however, personally side with the latter view.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people hold the opinion that doctors and engineers should work in the country where they trauned. One major reason why this view is supported is that the people of the area where this doctors and engineers are trained they are really need to the good quality treatments and equipments from them and it's a one kind of hope for them. This is because, when the face any help their owne people they might be develop their country; as a result, their country can develop for these kind of sectors.

On the other hand, it is also conceivable why some people hold the opine that they should be free to work in another country if they wish. One significant cause for this reason is that the doctors and engineers do not get proper respect and founds to do their work properly. This is due to the fact that, if we move to other country freely they might be get better opportunities; as a consequence, they can represent their country and proud himself. Another key explanation is that when they go to their personal choices countries they can earn much money or more knowledge; consequently,For instance, they can become more intelligent in their sectors .

In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that doctors and engineers should be free to work in another country if they want, based on resons discussed above.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You address both sides of the question and state your position clearly in the introduction and conclusion: you support professionals being free to work abroad. The first body paragraph gives a relevant reason for requiring them to stay—local communities need their services and this could support national development. The second offers reasons for mobility, including better opportunities, income and knowledge. However, these points are brief and sometimes unclear, and the discussion does not develop either view with a specific example or explanation. The response also contains 241 words, below the required 250; the 49 words copied from the prompt are not counted. Develop each main reason and add a relevant example to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Phrases such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the discussion. However, progression within the body paragraphs is not always clear. In the first, the move from local need to national development is difficult to follow, while the second paragraph combines respect, funding, opportunities, income and knowledge without clearly separating or developing these points. Some linking phrases are repetitive or awkwardly attached, such as “as a consequence” followed immediately by “For instance.” Organise each paragraph around one main reason, explain it, and then give an example; use referencing and connectors more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “professionals,” “proper respect,” “better opportunities,” and “sectors,” and the meaning is generally recoverable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation and spelling errors make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “trauned,” “founds,” “one kind of hope,” and “personal choices countries.” “Opine” is also an unsuitable substitute for “opinion” in this context. These inaccuracies sometimes obscure the intended point, particularly in the first body paragraph. Build a more precise set of expressions for discussing public services, professional migration and career development, and check spelling and natural word combinations before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using structures such as “One major reason why…” and “This is because…,” as well as a contrastive opening. However, the range is limited in practice because several longer sentences are not controlled, and frequent errors can make relationships between ideas hard to follow. For example, “the people … they are really need” has faulty clause structure and verb form, while “when the face any help” lacks a clear subject and uses an incorrect verb pattern. There are also agreement and article problems in “this doctors and engineers” and “they might be get.” Practise building accurate sentences with one clear subject and verb, then check agreement, articles and punctuation in longer clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.