Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent decades, professionals practices have become a common concern. Although many people believe that professionals should be worked in the country where they completed their training, others argue that it totally depends on them where they want to do work. In my opinion, both working inside or outside the country are important because it allows professionals to broaden their horizons as well as helps their local community.

On the one hand, proffesionals such as doctors and engineers should be worked in the place where they have completed their degree create better lifestyle for local people. This is because highly trained professionals can provide best services and treatment, which saves individuals time and money. For example, after completing degree some doctors open dispensary in their hometown to help the poor people. As a result, disadvantaged people get better services without travelling so far and helps improve people's standard of living.

On the other hand, working in different places can help professionals to broaden their knowledge and learn new skills. This is because new place puts workers in a difficult situation where they have to learn various things and adapt unfamiliar information. Also it enables workers to get higher knowledge which they cannot get in their trainig place. For instance, professionals move to abroad for PHD or getting higher degree. As a result, they can easily understand other's lifestyle and learn how to cope up in an unfamiliar situation.

In conclusion, although work inside the country allows professionals to help local community, work in other country can give the opportunity to develope their knowledge and skills. In my opinion, both work inside and outside the country is necessary for professionals and their society.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and give a clear overall position: you value work in the home country for its community benefits, while also supporting overseas work for professional development. The examples of doctors serving people in their hometown and professionals pursuing further study abroad are relevant. However, the discussion is uneven: the local-community argument is explained through access and cost, whereas the overseas-work paragraph shifts partly to studying for a higher degree and does not fully explain the benefits of working abroad. Your conclusion repeats the two sides but could make your own judgement more precise—for example, whether professionals should be free to choose despite the home country’s investment in their training. Developing that tension would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The progression from local benefits to professional development is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and also shows some stronger control through clear paragraphing. However, links within paragraphs can feel mechanical because several sentences rely on “This is because,” “Also,” and “As a result.” Some references are unclear, such as “which” in the first body paragraph, and “both working inside or outside” is not a clear parallel construction. Use more precise referencing and vary how you connect explanations and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “highly trained professionals,” “disadvantaged people,” “broaden their knowledge,” and “adapt.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “standard of living” and “unfamiliar situation.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, including “professionals practices,” “should be worked,” “get higher knowledge,” and “cope up.” Spelling and word-form errors such as “proffesionals,” “trainig,” “develope,” and “PHD” are noticeable and reduce precision. Build a reliable set of collocations for employment and education, and check spelling and word forms carefully; this will make your meaning more natural without requiring unnecessarily advanced vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “Although,” “because,” and “where,” and most of the main ideas remain understandable. However, some errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “professionals should be worked” uses an incorrect passive form, while “both work inside and outside the country is necessary” has a subject–verb agreement problem. In “create better lifestyle,” the sentence lacks a clear grammatical connection between the subject and verb, and “which saves individuals time and money” has an unclear reference. Practise forming complete subject–verb structures and checking agreement and articles, especially when combining ideas into longer sentences. Greater accuracy in these patterns would strengthen the range you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.