Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Skilled workers like doctors and engineers are pillors and high demanded workers in country .The advocates contend that they should w
ork in their home country where they did graduates .Conversely ,critics of this approach ague that they are free to work another country if they want .From my vantage point i believe that they work where they want to work .Therefore ,this eassy will discuss both view and elucidate with valid justification and example followed by a reason conclusion statement.
On the one hand , skilled workers should be work for their country where they are trained . People are hoped for well trained professional for their nation and people .The country trained and put all effort for professionals to serve in emergency.For site an example , in covid time when mass healthworkers need to serve people. The government spend funds on skilled workers for training than they are not allowed to move another country for work .
In the contrary , professionals have right to choose where they work . They are devoted for career growth and high wages. For instance , doctors and engineers are highdemanded in others country than obviously they are dont miss the chance . The professional growth is essential for experience and for future .The skilledworkers expect more wages after long wait and hardwork .
In a nutshell , they are not forced to work in home country where they done training while work in others country give them opporunity to professional growth and good salary .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both sides of the debate and state your view in the introduction: “they work where they want to work.” The two body paragraphs also give relevant reasons, including public investment in training, emergency healthcare needs, career growth, and higher wages. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than explained. For example, the COVID-19 reference does not clearly show why trained professionals should be required to remain, and the claim that workers are “not allowed to move” is not supported. Your conclusion repeats your preference but does not fully weigh the competing arguments. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make your position more consistently explicit throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. “On the one hand” and “In the contrary” signal the change in viewpoint, so the reader can follow the basic organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and some links are unclear. For instance, the COVID-19 example is introduced with “For site an example” but its connection to the claim about compulsory service is not fully explained. The final paragraph also moves quickly from rejecting compulsion to mentioning salary and professional growth. Use linking phrases accurately and build each paragraph around one main idea, followed by explanation and a directly relevant example.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt vocabulary suited to the topic, including “career growth,” “emergency,” “professional,” and “skilled workers.” However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts difficult to understand, such as “pillors and high demanded workers,” “did graduates,” and “highdemanded in others country.” Spelling errors such as “eassy,” “opporunity,” and “hardwork” also reduce clarity. Aim for accurate, natural phrases rather than more elaborate wording: for example, “essential workers,” “completed their training,” and “in high demand abroad.” Check spelling and word forms carefully, and learn common collocations related to employment, public funding, and professional development.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use some longer sentence forms, including “The country trained and put all effort for professionals to serve in emergency,” and attempt to connect ideas with “than” and “while.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in verb forms, articles, agreement, and sentence construction can make meaning unclear. Examples include “they should be work,” “The government spend funds,” and “they are dont miss the chance.” Several sentences also lack the grammatical structure needed to express the intended relationship between ideas. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using clauses such as “because” and “although.” Pay particular attention to verb forms after modal verbs, subject–verb agreement, and articles.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.