Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the modern era, skills and training are essential to develop deeply knowledge for professionals. Many individuals believe that work should be required in the country where they complete their training. while others argue that they can work in another country where they want. I will discuss both views and explain why i believe that professional should work in the country where they complete their training.

On the one hand, one of the most significant reasons is that they engaged the environment and culture of the country where they did their training. In addition, they also known about the language of the country. For instance, a computer science student develop skills in their relevant field and can apply these skills in their field because he familiar about the culture and environment. It is also beneficial for the country where he develop the skills. Therefore, government should be required work for the professional as they can help for globally progess of the country.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You state a clear opinion—that professionals should work in the country where they trained—and give one relevant reason: familiarity with the local culture, environment, and language. However, the response addresses the task only partially. The opposing view, that professionals should be free to work abroad, is mentioned in the introduction but never discussed, and your own position is not supported with a developed example. The computer-science example is brief and does not clearly show why working in the training country benefits either the professional or society. The response also does not meet the required minimum length, leaving too little space to develop both views. Explain the benefits and drawbacks of each position, then support your opinion with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: an introduction presents the topic and your position, followed by a paragraph beginning “On the one hand” that gives a reason for your view. Linking expressions such as “In addition,” “For instance,” and “Therefore” help show relationships between points. However, there is no paragraph developing the other side or a conclusion, so the response has no clear overall progression and ends abruptly. Some links are also not fully logical: the example about a computer-science student does not clearly connect to the claim that governments should require professionals to stay. Use separate body paragraphs for each view, make each example directly support its point, and finish by restating your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “professionals,” “training,” “skills,” “culture,” and “environment,” and the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms are inaccurate, which makes parts of the message difficult to interpret. For example, “develop deeply knowledge” is not a natural expression, while “globally progess” appears to mean the country’s overall progress. “Engaged the environment” also does not express the intended idea clearly. Aim for precise collocations and check spelling and word forms. Phrases such as “gain in-depth knowledge,” “become familiar with the local environment,” and “contribute to national development” would communicate your points more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a sentence introduced by “For instance” and one beginning “Therefore.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “Many individuals believe that work should be required,” where the intended subject is unclear, and “government should be required work,” which has an incorrect verb pattern. There are also problems with agreement and verb forms in “they also known” and “a computer science student develop,” as well as sentence-boundary and capitalisation errors after “training.” Practise building accurate clauses with clear subjects, and check verb forms, articles, and sentence punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.