Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is often argued by some people that professionals such as doctors and engineers should work in the country where they completed their training while others believe that they should work where they want. However, I agree that they should be free to work where they want because if they get the opportunity to work at international level they can start their jobs without any barrier.
On the one hand, the supporters of the view that professionls should work in their own country where they did their training because they believe that they should serve their own country and its people. One compelling justification is that young generation is more talented as compared to elder generation they have more knowledge and they should serve their own country. For example, young doctors and teachers are more talented and educated, they get their education from best institutions so they will better encourage the coming generation. However, the supporters of this view support their point with clear ideas.
On the other hand, the advocates of the view that if the young professionals get an opportunity to work in different countries they should feel free to work where they want because they may get better facilities there. For example, they can get better lifestyle in other country, they may get more pay in other country. They will get a chance to explore international culture and they may start another course for specialization. Thus, the advocates of this view proved their point with strong evidences.
To sum up, some individuals believe that professionals should work in their own country and serve its people while i strongly believe that if they would get a better opportunity in other country they should definately move for their better lifestyle and future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both positions and state your own view clearly in the introduction and conclusion: you support professionals being free to work abroad when better opportunities arise. The reasons for each side are relevant, including serving one’s country, earning more, and gaining access to better facilities or further specialisation. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The claim that younger professionals are more talented is asserted rather than explained, and the example shifts from doctors and engineers to teachers. The benefits of working abroad are also listed without showing how they compare with the responsibility to serve the country that funded training. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make the comparison more convincing.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To sum up” make the structure easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, progression is sometimes mechanical or unclear. For instance, “However, the supporters of this view support their point with clear ideas” repeats the preceding claim without adding a new step, while “Thus, the advocates of this view proved their point” is a general closing rather than a link between the reasons. Use cohesive devices to show relationships between ideas, and make each paragraph progress from its main claim to explanation and evidence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “professionals,” “specialization,” “facilities,” and “international culture.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “compelling justification” and “advocates of the view.” However, the range is limited by repeated wording, especially “work where they want,” “other country,” and “supporters of this view.” Some choices are inaccurate or unnatural, including “strong evidences” and “better encourage the coming generation”; spelling errors such as “professionls” and “definately” also reduce control. Build a more precise range for discussing migration and public service, and check collocations and spelling so your meaning sounds natural and exact.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using clauses with “because,” “while,” and “if,” and the overall meaning is generally understandable. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences awkward. For example, “the supporters of the view that professionls should work…” lacks a complete grammatical construction after “view,” while “if they would get a better opportunity” uses an unsuitable conditional form. There are also agreement and article problems in “young generation is” and “in other country,” as well as inconsistent capitalisation of “i.” Practise building accurate conditional and relative clauses, and check articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries before adding more complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.