Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is widely acknowledged that professionals like doctors and engineers should be required to work in their own country or they should be free to work in another country has now become an increasingly contenteous issue in contemporary society. While some people believe that professionals should be free to work in another country if they wish. I firmly believe that after getting abroad exposure they must come back and give their services to the country where they did their training.

To commence with, one main justification is that doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did the trainning. This is largely attributed to government investment means government spend money on universities and professional trainning centers. So, skilled professionals contributes to the economic growth. For example, engineers can help to develop road, bridges and infrastructure. Similarly, doctors can help to improve the living standards of their own communities by providing services to poor families.

Another pivotal consideration is that it should be free to work in another country if they wish because its everyone individual right no one force them to contribute in their own country. For example if an engineer find s a job in germany that pay better than in pakistan then they must join it. Similarly, advanced technology in another country also build more professional doctors and engineers and abroad experience may help them to boost their personality and knowledge. So, they can get more better opportunities in the field.

To recaptulate, although differing viewpoints persist the prepondarance of evidance supports the view that its totally depend on professionals if they get better opportunities in their own country or in another country they must go for that. Therefor, adopting this approach apperas both pragmatic and beneficial in long run.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You discuss both views and state a position: you support professionals gaining overseas experience and then returning to serve their training country. The paragraphs also include relevant reasons, such as public investment in training and better opportunities abroad. However, the conclusion shifts to saying professionals should choose whichever country offers better opportunities, which conflicts with your earlier position and leaves your opinion unclear. Several points are asserted rather than explained—for example, the claim that overseas technology improves professionals’ knowledge needs a clearer link to the choice of where they should work. The response is also 243 words, seven short of the required minimum; the 54 words copied from the task prompt are excluded from the count. Develop the reasoning and maintain one consistent position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting the different views, and a conclusion. Topic phrases such as “To commence with” and “Another pivotal consideration” help signal the paragraph focus, and examples generally follow the relevant claims. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “For example” and “Similarly,” and the links between ideas are not always clear. In the second body paragraph, the right to choose, higher pay, and access to advanced technology are listed without showing how they connect. The conclusion also contradicts the introduction, weakening the overall progression. Use fewer formulaic transitions, explain the relationship between each reason and the main argument, and ensure the conclusion follows the position established earlier.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “government investment,” “economic growth,” “living standards,” and “advanced technology,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “pivotal consideration” and “pragmatic.” However, the range is uneven, and several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “contenteous,” “trainning,” “recaptulate,” and “prepondarance” are misspelled, while “more better opportunities” is not a natural expression. Some phrases are also vague, such as “boost their personality.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully; precise wording will make your arguments clearer without requiring more elaborate vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a subordinate clause in “if an engineer find s a job in germany that pay better than in pakistan.” However, complex constructions are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences awkward or difficult to follow. For example, the opening sentence combines two views in an incomplete structure, and “While some people believe that professionals should be free to work in another country if they wish” is a dependent clause left without a main clause. There are also agreement and article errors, as in “professionals contributes” and “its everyone individual right.” Practise building complete sentences with clear subjects and verbs, and check agreement, articles, and punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.