Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be assigned to work in the country where they they completed their training, whereas some argue that they should be free to work in another country if they wants to. I partly agree that professionals should work in the country where they did their training first and then later on if they wish to explore, then they can do it.

Training is very crucial to build any working class professional, and this training is received in the country, where government and their people do a huge favour to support that development by financing in different ways and in return, people expect that once they are fully grown, they will serve them based on their respective professions. For instance, a doctor does his training or internship in the rural area to understand different medical cases, scenarios to understand diseases and the root cause etc. So, once they are fully developed, if they move to another country, those people will be neglected from the end product where they have had a huge contribution.

On the other habd, if professionals stick to their home country, they will never be fully grown, will not have that wider exposure, or will not have the chance to learn and developed new innovations, casw studies etc. which is very significant for their career in the long run. Moving out of your comfort zone is the first stwp that you take to achieve greater heights in life, and eventually put a postive footprint towards the betterment of humanity.

In conclusion, I would say that while both are important, but professionals should prioritize their country first, and later they can move to another country to achieve experience and exposure.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and give a clear, consistent position: professionals should serve the country that trained them before seeking opportunities elsewhere. The explanation that public funding creates an expectation of service is relevant, and the rural-training example helps illustrate the contribution made by the host country. You also explain the opposing view through wider exposure and learning innovations. However, these points are not equally developed: the benefits of working abroad are asserted rather than supported with a specific example, and the proposed “first, then later” arrangement is not explained in practical terms. Develop each side with a fuller reason or example and clarify how long professionals should serve locally. The response meets the required length; 32 words copied from the task prompt were not counted.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your position. Transitions such as “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes loose: the rural internship example moves quickly from training to the claim that people will be neglected, without clearly connecting the steps. The conclusion’s “while both are important, but” also combines two contrasting structures awkwardly. Use clearer links between claims and evidence, and make each paragraph develop one central point in sequence. More precise referencing would also help clarify who “they” and “those people” refer to.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “financing,” “rural area,” “wider exposure,” “innovations,” and “betterment of humanity.” These choices allow you to discuss training, public investment, and career development. However, several expressions are imprecise or unnatural for the intended meaning, such as “fully grown” for professionally qualified, “stick to their home country,” and “put a positive footprint.” There are also spelling errors, including “habd,” “casw,” “stwp,” and “postive,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully; this will make your ideas sound more natural and academically appropriate without requiring more complicated vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “whereas,” “if,” and “while,” and most of the main ideas remain understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, and sentence construction recur. For example, “if they wants to” should be “if they want to,” and “learn and developed” should be “learn and develop.” The opening also repeats “they,” while “while both are important, but” uses two competing conjunction patterns. Some long sentences, particularly the one beginning “Training is very crucial,” contain several ideas joined without clear grammatical control. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and parallel verb forms, and divide sentences when they carry too many clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.