Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is a debate that many skilled employees such as doctors and engineers, should do their job in the nations where they get their skills whereas other thinks they can work in the nations they wanted to. This essay will discussed both the views, followed by my opinion.

To begin with, there are various reasons why professionals should work in the nations where they did their training. Firstly, it can have different process in other countries. To explain, different nation can have different process in doing medication and projects which can create obstacles for them to learn the different way. Secondly, it will benefit the country where they learn. Elaborating further, government likes to benefit own nations by having high professionals, which provides them a great success in fields.

On the other hand, there are also several factors why workers should get freedom to work in any countries. The first factor is it will encourage them to do best in their work. To clarify, when people get happiness in their workplace, their work will show the best result which is the greatest success of every professionals in different fields. Similarly, the another reason is it's their personal choice. For instance, indivduals pay for their training so that they can have the freedom of working anywhere without others interference because it is right they get provided by any government.

In conclusion, both has their positive and negative consquences on own. Regarding my opinion, I completely agree with the second statement because anyone can work in their interested places or countries which doesnot hamper their skills and where they can show their higher potential of own hardwork and struggles.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a clear preference for allowing professionals to choose where they work, so the main parts of the task are present. The reasons are relevant: you mention adapting to different professional systems, the benefit to the country that trained them, job satisfaction, and personal choice. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported. For example, the claim that different processes “can create obstacles” is not illustrated, and the benefit to the training country is described only generally as “great success in fields.” Your conclusion repeats your position but does not weigh the arguments. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make your view more explicit throughout the discussion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers recognise the stages of the argument. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some stronger control through paragraphing. However, links between individual claims are sometimes mechanical, with repeated frames such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “To clarify.” Some references are also unclear, particularly “both has their positive and negative consequences on own,” which does not clearly identify what “both” refers to. Use a wider range of natural links and make references explicit, while ensuring each paragraph develops one connected line of reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general discussion, including “professionals,” “training,” “workplace,” and “personal choice.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “Regarding my opinion” and “show their higher potential.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the meaning harder to follow. Examples include “different process,” “benefit own nations,” “the another reason,” and “positive and negative consequences on own.” Spelling errors such as “indivduals,” “doesnot,” and “consquences” also reduce accuracy. Build a bank of natural collocations for this topic and check spelling and word forms carefully; prioritise precise, straightforward expressions over awkwardly formal ones.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas,” “when,” and “because.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main message is generally understandable. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “This essay will discussed” should use the base verb after “will,” while “other thinks” and “both has” show agreement problems. In “the nations they wanted to,” the tense and clause structure are not controlled, and “the another reason” has an article error. Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then build longer sentences with one clear subordinate clause. Proofread specifically for subject–verb agreement and verb forms after modal verbs.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.