Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argue that, nowadays many professional who are done thier research or study in different coutries have to do their job in particular country, while other contend that people should not push them to work in same nation as they complete their training. In my opinion, professional individuals immigrant to another country because of high quality of life and better infrastructure and enhance their wealthy standard.

First and foremost, The most of the person particularly doctors and engineers are immigrant to better quality of educational countries to do their masters, at the same time they obtain a better job based on their fields this will assist to enhance the quality of life of the individuals. Furthermore, they can find a quality of school for their childrens to study better, this can widen the children perspective and innovative ideas and knowledge. For example, in many countries people who are pursuing doctors field are intend to do master in european side like germany because of the governments provide all the facility for them and acquire good salary compare to their own nations.

Addrssing the negativity, forcing people to saty in one country is restrict the freedom of their own . professionals also gain some experience in abroad, since exposure to different working method improve their expertise. many return with valuable experience, a phenonemenon sometime called "brain gain". Moreover, compulsion can breed resentment, leading to poor motivation and lower quality of work.

In conclusion, although the country has legitimate interest in beneficial from profession it trains, strict legal obligation is neither fair nor effective. improving condition at home, combine with modest repaymentschemes.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You present a relevant position: you oppose requiring professionals to remain in the country where they trained, and your conclusion suggests improving conditions at home rather than imposing strict obligations. You also mention potential benefits of working abroad, including broader experience and “brain gain.” However, the two views are not discussed with equal clarity. The first body paragraph mainly explains why people move for education, family opportunities and better living standards, rather than fully explaining why a country might require trained professionals to work there. The example about studying in Germany is relevant but does not clearly support the training-country obligation. Develop the public investment and staffing arguments on one side, then compare them with professionals’ freedom and benefits to host countries and individuals.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “First and foremost” and “Addressing the negativity,” and a conclusion. This gives the reader a general route through your argument. Some links, however, are mechanical or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas. For example, “at the same time” introduces a job benefit, while the connection between children’s schooling and the main debate is not made explicit. The second body paragraph shifts from freedom to experience and then motivation, but these points would be easier to follow if grouped and explained in a clearer sequence. The conclusion is very brief and ends with an incomplete recommendation. Use clearer referencing and transitions, and ensure each paragraph develops one side of the discussion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “infrastructure,” “expertise,” “resentment,” and “brain gain,” which helps convey ideas beyond basic everyday language. However, inaccurate word forms, spelling and collocations are frequent enough to make some points difficult to interpret. Examples include “professional individuals immigrant,” “enhance their wealthy standard,” and “beneficial from profession it trains.” Several expressions also sound unnatural, such as “european side” and “pursuing doctors field.” These issues limit precision even when the intended meaning can be inferred. Build a reliable set of topic-specific phrases—such as “retain skilled workers” and “publicly funded training”—and check spelling and collocations. Prefer accurate, natural wording over ambitious phrases that do not fit the sentence.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause with “since” and a result clause with “leading to.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction often make the reader work to understand the point. For instance, “It is often argue” needs a passive form, while “forcing people to stay in one country is restrict” combines incompatible verb patterns. In “many return with valuable experience,” the reference of “many” is also unclear. Some sentences run several ideas together, particularly in the first body paragraph. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and separating linked claims into complete sentences; then check each sentence for a clear subject, verb and logical connection.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.