Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays, people believe that proffessionals ,such as doctors and engineers,should be required to work in the country, others argue that the people should be free to work in another country if they wish. I personally believe that people should work in another country if they wish.
On the one hand, some people argue that professionals such as doctors and enginners should work in the country where they did their training. this is mainly because the these people can help their country develop by doing the jobs in their relevant fileds for example doctors joining in the local hospitals will help their country people to get better treatment and also helps the hospital reputation and also for an engineer after completing their training they will join in a software company and can develop a new software will be helpful for the country.Therefore, people working in the same country where they completed their training can help their country grow and develop.
On the other hand, others belive that they should be free to work in another country if they wish. the main reason behind it is if they work in other countries they can vastly expand their knowledge by learn those countries technologies and features and they can also have good financial income and stability, for instance a person who worked in a software company can learn only what that company teaches and if the same person switches to another country he or she can learn new things from another company and can also have an increment in their salaries. I personally support this view because people can get a chance to learn new things and expand their intelligence. Hence, people should be free to work in another country if they wish.
In conclusion,although bith views have their own merits, i believe that people should be free to work in another country because they get a chance to learn new things.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both positions and state your own view clearly: the introduction and conclusion support professionals being free to work abroad. The reasons are relevant, including local services and development on one side, and learning opportunities and financial stability on the other. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The examples about doctors helping hospitals and engineers joining software companies are broad, and the claim that working abroad expands knowledge would be stronger with a specific explanation of how that expertise benefits the professional or society. The response therefore addresses the task, but its ideas remain somewhat general and unevenly supported. To strengthen it, explain each main reason in more depth and make the link between examples and your position explicit.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Phrases such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several points are joined into long, loosely connected sentences, especially in the first body paragraph. Connectors such as “and also” are repeated, and some transitions do not clearly show how one idea leads to the next. Improve cohesion by giving each paragraph a clear sequence—claim, explanation, example, and result—and use a wider range of linking expressions and clear pronoun references.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “professionals,” “financial income and stability,” “technologies,” and “develop.” However, the range is limited and some expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as “expand their intelligence,” “helps the hospital reputation,” and “an increment in their salaries.” Spelling errors, including “proffessionals,” “enginners,” “belive,” and “bith,” are noticeable and reduce the accuracy of the writing. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, you could describe professionals as “broaden their expertise,” say that a hospital’s reputation “may improve,” and refer to “a salary increase” rather than an increment in salaries.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “because,” “if,” and “where,” so there is some variety. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence boundaries, articles, agreement, and punctuation sometimes make the ideas harder to follow. For example, “this is mainly because the these people” has an unnecessary article, while “doctors joining in the local hospitals will help … and also helps” shifts awkwardly between plural and singular agreement. Several sentences run together without appropriate punctuation, particularly the explanation of how professionals can help their country. Practise building accurate complex sentences and separating independent clauses with full stops or suitable conjunctions; also check subject–verb agreement and article use during revision.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.