Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

From an analytical perspective,some people think that the professionals such as doctors and engineers should work in the same country where they complete there training.Whereas, others think that they should be free to work in another countary if they wish has attracted widespread attention because of its growing significance. In my view, the first argument sounds more convincing.

On one hand, many people believe that tge professionals like doctors and engineers should work in the country where they completed their training.If the professionals work in same countary where they learn and completed their practicce they will get more benefits. They will easily and fastly completed their projects like if a Doctor joining job in the same country where he practiced he will deal patients easily because he knew 50 % diseases of those part or city because he completed his practice their. If we go to talk about professal engineer he will also gets more benefits there like he knows the good quality and interesting prices of pure materials.

Conversely, opponents rightly argue that they should be free to work in another country if they wish because if they will go abroad maybe they will get more profit.Moreover, they will also increase their buisness after visiting in different countries because it will increase their knowledge, but it also have sideeffects they should live alone without their family for months or foe years .

In coclusion, although it is good for professionals to help their own country, they should also have freedom to build there career anywhere in the world.In my view, the first argument sounds more convincing

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both views and state a position in the introduction and conclusion: you find the case for working in the training country more convincing. However, the response only partially develops the task. The benefits of staying are illustrated through familiarity with patients and local materials, but the claims are unclear or insufficiently explained; for example, knowing “50 % diseases” does not clearly show how training creates this knowledge. The opposing view is mainly reduced to higher profit and increased knowledge, with little explanation of why professionals should have the freedom to choose. The response contains 247 words, three below the 250-word minimum; the 20 words copied from the prompt are not counted. Develop each side with a clear reason and a relevant, specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “On one hand,” “Conversely,” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven, and some links between ideas are unclear. In the first body paragraph, the move from doctors’ familiarity with patients to engineers’ knowledge of materials is abrupt, while “they will get more benefits” is repeated without specifying those benefits. The sentence beginning “Whereas” is also attached awkwardly to the preceding idea. Use clearer topic sentences, organise each paragraph around one main reason, and make references such as “there” and “it” unambiguous.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “professionals,” “completed their training,” “abroad,” and “freedom to build their career.” This is enough to communicate the general subject, but the range is limited and several inaccurate or misspelled choices make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “countary,” “practicce,” “professal engineer,” and “sideeffects.” Some phrases are also imprecise: “increase their business after visiting in different countries” does not clearly express the intended benefit, and “interesting prices” is an unsuitable collocation for materials. Aim for accurate topic-specific terms and check spelling; choosing precise expressions will make your reasons clearer without relying on repeated words such as “benefits” and “increase.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example about a doctor working where they trained and a contrast introduced by “although.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. For example, “if they wish has attracted widespread attention” lacks a clear grammatical connection, and “if they will go abroad maybe they will get more profit” uses an awkward conditional form. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, as in “work in same countary” and “it also have sideeffects.” Practise forming complete clauses and checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and verb forms. Shorter, accurately controlled sentences would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.