Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Some people often argue that people with high qualifications, like doctors and engineers, have to work in the countries where they did their training, whereas some others think they are free to work in any other country if they want. Although both of these perspectives have their arguments, I believe that professionals have the freedom to move to wherever place they desire.
On the one hand, individuals who believe that professionals are required to work in their home countries argue that these people owe their countries. This is because training such highly qualified professionals requires tons of money and resources, especially in countries where education is free, so when a professional walks out of the door this means another loss for the country and that investment could have been reserved for another individual that would actually stay and benefit his training country. Therefore, these highly trained individuals are required to stay and pay back their debt to the nation that invested in them.
On the other hand, people who argue that professionals are free to move out, contend that the ability to move wherever someone wants is derived from the right of every individual to be free. One major reason for this is that requiring individuals to stay is a kind of imprisonment, especially that some developing countries want their professionals to stay, but do not offer suitable opportunities for them. For instance, they do not offer appropriate salaries, enough jobs, good healthcare, good education for childeren and good retirement plans. Thus, countries who do not offer the right environment for its highly qualified individuals do not have the right to oblige them to stay. I personally find this argument much more convincing due to the fact that people are free to follow their goals and take advantage of the best opportunities they can find out in this world.
In conclusion, although the first view might sound reasonable to some extent, I believe that the freedom is the most important right for any individual and if any country wants to keep its professionals it should work more on itself in order to appeal them.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both views and state your position clearly: the introduction and conclusion support professionals’ freedom to choose where they work. The two main arguments are relevant, especially the public investment in training and the lack of suitable opportunities in some countries. The examples of salaries, jobs, healthcare and retirement plans help explain the second view. However, the first view is developed mainly as a claim that professionals owe a debt to their country; a specific example or fuller explanation of how their departure affects services would make it more convincing. Your own position is clear, but its implications could be explored further. This response covers the task well overall, while some ideas remain less fully developed than others.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The progression from the investment argument to the freedom argument is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” guide the reader. Some linking is less natural or precise, however. For example, “Therefore” introduces a conclusion that largely repeats the preceding claim, while “Thus” similarly restates the point about unsuitable conditions. The long sentence beginning “For instance” also packs several examples into one sequence. To strengthen progression, make the relationship between each reason and its consequence more explicit, and vary transitions rather than relying mainly on standard signposting.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.5
You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “highly qualified,” “resources,” “investment,” “imprisonment,” and “retirement plans.” These choices communicate the main ideas clearly, and some less common terms show an attempt to express nuanced arguments. There are, however, several imprecise or informal collocations, such as “tons of money,” “walks out of the door,” and “work more on itself.” “Reserved for another individual” is also not the most natural way to describe allocating public training funds. The spelling “childeren” should be corrected to “children.” More precise academic phrasing and more consistent collocation would make the vocabulary more flexible and controlled.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5
You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including contrast clauses (“Although both of these perspectives…”), relative clauses, and conditional phrasing (“if any country wants to keep its professionals…”). Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors and awkward constructions persist. In “countries who do not offer … for its highly qualified individuals,” the relative pronoun and possessive do not agree with the plural noun; use “countries that … for their professionals.” The phrase “especially that some developing countries” needs a more suitable clause structure, such as “particularly because some developing countries.” In the final sentence, the clause beginning “and if any country…” would be clearer with punctuation or restructuring. Review agreement, clause formation, and sentence boundaries while retaining your range of complex forms.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.