Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-07-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In today's contemporary world, it is often argued that, the specialists should formulate their career in the nation where they accomplished their graduation. While Others believes that, they should have the freedom to pursue their career in any country. I firmly believe that, the professionals should have the right to choose the optimal region to follow their career without any bondage. This essay will focus on both the arguments.

In many countries, the taxpayers subsidise higher education in particular fields like, medical and engineering. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect from graduates to follow their career in the nation where they got qualified. For example, the country would face numerous consequences and scarcity in the sectors of hospital, information and technology department and mechanical engineering due to the increasing migration of student to abroad countries.

In contrast, every individual have the right to pursue their career according to their choice, as migrating to foreign nations can help an individual to get better exposure in their respective field. Additionally, abroad countries can provide have improved working environment with better opportunities and an individual can gain the required experience to add in the resume. For example, an expert can be provided with better equipment and machine to use and work with which they can increase confidence in their firm.

To conclude, I firmly maintain an idea that, professional should be provided with ideal opportunities in a respective country which can decrease the migration of students to abroad nations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The essay addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the response falls slightly short of the 250-word minimum requirement, which limits the depth of the arguments. While the main points are relevant, the development is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument regarding taxpayers' money is a good starting point, but it lacks a more nuanced exploration of the ethical or economic implications. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph provides a more detailed explanation and a concrete example to fully flesh out the ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'In many countries,' 'In contrast,' and 'Additionally' are used to link sentences and paragraphs. However, the use of these devices is sometimes a bit mechanical. The referencing is generally clear, though the flow between sentences could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words to create a more natural, sophisticated transition between arguments. The paragraphing is appropriate, but the final conclusion is quite abrupt and could be better connected to the preceding points.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to express ideas clearly. There are some attempts at using topic-specific vocabulary, such as 'subsidise,' 'specialists,' and 'optimal region.' However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and word choice, such as 'bondage' (which has a specific historical/legal connotation not fitting here) and 'abroad countries' (which is non-standard; 'foreign countries' or 'overseas' is preferred). To reach a higher band, focus on more precise collocations and avoid repetitive or slightly unnatural phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('every individual have,' 'professional should be provided') and punctuation errors (unnecessary commas after 'argued that,' and 'believe that,'). While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, pay closer attention to subject-verb agreement and the rules regarding comma usage in complex sentences. Increasing the variety of complex structures while ensuring accuracy will help elevate the score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.