Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
People in various professions such as healthcare, technology usually prefer shifting to foreign countries. Some people argue that the individuals should work in the same country where they gained the knowledge and experience while others agree to their departure since it is truly a person's choice. Both the views will be discussed in this essay and my opinion will be given at the end.
To begin with, when a person chooses to work in the same region where the training has been completed, it often offers certain benefits such as ease, comfort, well adaptation during work. Consequently, young population is very essential for a nation in order to achieve significant success. Along with this, some individuals believe in serving their mother country, so they devote their future years in the same country. Furthermore, parents and loved ones are always left behind while moving due to which personal bonds and relationships gets affected. For instance, in country like India where maximum youngsters are shifting to different foreign countries eventually suffer from homesickness and loneliness due to absence of family members.
However on the other side, foreign migration has numerous advantages. Firstly, a person gets many opportunities for further studies and work, thus, it ensures success and bright future. Secondly, an individual can do part-time or some temporary jobs on hourly wages which will evntually enhance the financial stability and independance. Moruover, many foreign countries not only have lavish and classic lifestyles but also have diminished pollution level, both of these are of paramount importance for a pesonality development. For example, India has AQI - Air Quality Index of an avreye [redacted phone] which contries like USA, UK, Canada have it nearly to 5-10.
Therefore, in my opinion if a person wishes to move out from their wuntry of origin, they should not husitate as the shifting fosters overall growth and success. Henu to conclude, people ought to conside both the sidy and then make appropriate duision as their future depends on it.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the benefits of domestic service versus the opportunities provided by migration. However, some points are slightly under-developed; for instance, the argument regarding 'personality development' through lifestyle and pollution levels is a bit tangential to the core debate of professional training. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the writer's stance. To reach a higher band, ensure that all supporting points are directly linked to the professional implications of the migration debate.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Consequently', 'However', and 'Therefore' are used to guide the reader through the argument. While the progression is generally smooth, some transitions feel slightly mechanical. Additionally, there are minor issues with referencing, such as the vague use of 'both of these' in the third paragraph, which could be more precisely linked to the preceding nouns. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate and the logical flow is maintained throughout the text.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some attempts at less common items like 'paramount importance' and 'financial stability'. However, there are several spelling errors ('evntually', 'independance', 'Moruover', 'wuntry', 'husitate', 'Henu', 'conside', 'sidy', 'duision') that distract the reader. While these do not impede communication, they indicate a lack of control over spelling. To improve, focus on proofreading for common spelling mistakes and try to incorporate more precise academic collocations rather than relying on general descriptors like 'lavish' or 'classic'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is a good attempt at using conditional and comparative structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('in country like India', 'in order to achieve significant success'), subject-verb agreement ('relationships gets affected'), and word forms ('well adaptation'). While these errors are noticeable, they rarely impede the reader's understanding of the main arguments. To achieve a higher band, focus on consistent article usage and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed with greater grammatical precision.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.