Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Many people believe that professionals, for instance doctors and engineers, should be work in the same country where they completed their training, while others think they are free to work anywhere they want. This essay will discuss both sides and why i approach with former people side.
First and foremost, many country government provide free funding for those students who are eligible to be a doctor and engineer. This is because many country need huge amount of doctors and engineers to full fill their country people demand. Sometimes authority need doctor for government hospitals, where they provide free treatment to the poverty people of its country. Moreover, also in engineers sector government do the same things and after completed their training they get some benefits from administration. For this reason, government provide free scholarship to the talented student of its county and also sometimes head of the people authority offer good salary to work in their own country, where they did their training . As a result, all the people of country get proper treatment and live healthier lives. Also individuals get exact map or research from engineers to build their building.
On the other hand, doctors and engineers have this opportunity to work any country they want. Due to, when they complete their study they got their license and free to work, where they wish. However, this things impact on a country, which give scholarship to then to work for its country. Furthermore, own country people do not get proper treatment and do not get the research for build something. For instance, the country do not get refund from professional, behind whom they invest. Consequently, the people of this country affected by many ways. Such as, lack of treatment and so on.
In conclusion, i agree with former people, because every doctor and engineer must be need to work for those country, who give funding to free study.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat repetitive and lacks depth. For instance, the argument regarding government funding is mentioned multiple times without introducing new perspectives or nuanced examples. While the position is consistent, the supporting points are underdeveloped, and the explanation of the consequences of professionals leaving is quite basic. To improve, you should aim to provide more specific examples or explore the counter-argument (the right to freedom of movement) with greater depth, rather than focusing almost exclusively on the financial aspect of training.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'Due to, when they complete...' and 'Such as, lack of treatment...' are grammatically incorrect and disrupt the flow of ideas. While there is an attempt to use transition words like 'First and foremost' and 'On the other hand', the internal logic within paragraphs is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and repetitive sentence structures. Improving the variety and accuracy of linking words will significantly enhance the coherence of your writing.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward word choices and non-standard collocations, such as 'full fill their country people demand' and 'poverty people'. Additionally, the repetition of basic terms like 'doctors and engineers' and 'work' limits the lexical variety. To achieve a higher score, you should focus on using more sophisticated vocabulary and ensuring that words are used in their correct collocations, such as 'address the needs of the population' instead of 'full fill their country people demand'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'many country government provide'), incorrect article usage, and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'i approach with former people side'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement will help improve your accuracy.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.