Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
here is a huge gap between countries in terms of financial compensation across various professions and sectors. While a proportion of individuals argue that experts in fields like medicine and construction must be working in the place they were trained in. This essay will discuss viewpoints and present my personal point of view.
On one hand doing an internship in a particular country means that equipment support and room for productivity are provided to the learner. Which effectively means the student should be loyal and benefit that nation with his abilities and experience. In addition it will optimise the practical-education reputation of the nation that teached him the application of his major in the occupation market. For instance, India's reputation in the financial sector enhanced drastically after government intervention in persuading talented investment bankers and equity researchers to work in Delhi's corporate district.
On the other hand it is impossible for any economy to be developed and dynamic in all field. In other words professionals will unavoidable look for a economy that helps them to succeed it is in the same country he was trained in or out. Some governments impose high income taxes on employees despite the benefit given by them. A clear example of this can be seen in the united kingdom where thousand of creative employees move to cities because the taxes are too high compare to other country people moved in other country like Dubai and Netherlands due to exaggerated taxes.
In conclusion despite both sides holding divers options from my perspective I strongly hold the view that professionals like doctors and project managers should be allow work in any country.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The essay addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. The first paragraph contains a sentence fragment ('While a proportion...'), and the second paragraph's argument regarding India is slightly tangential to the core issue of professional migration. The conclusion is also quite brief and lacks a summary of the main points. To reach a higher band, you should ensure that each paragraph fully explores the implications of the arguments rather than just stating them. The position is clear, but the supporting evidence could be more robustly linked to the prompt's focus on professional training and global mobility.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or inaccurate. For instance, the transition 'In other words' is used incorrectly in the third paragraph, as it does not paraphrase the preceding sentence. Additionally, there are issues with sentence-level cohesion, such as the fragment starting with 'Which effectively means' in the second paragraph. While the overall structure is clear, the internal linking of ideas needs more precision and variety to achieve a higher score.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'financial compensation', 'optimise', and 'exaggerated'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'teached' (should be 'taught'), 'application of his major in the occupation market' (should be 'job market'), and 'divers options' (should be 'diverse opinions'). These errors occasionally hinder the flow of the text. To improve, focus on learning the correct collocations for professional and academic contexts and ensure you are using words in their correct grammatical form.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('thousand of creative employees move'), incorrect verb forms ('should be allow work'), and punctuation errors. The presence of sentence fragments, such as 'Which effectively means the student should be loyal...', significantly impacts the accuracy of the writing. While the meaning is generally clear, the persistent grammatical slips prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on proofreading for basic errors like verb tense consistency and sentence completeness.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.