Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often argued that wile some individuals think that the professional people, who are doctors and engineers, ought to be required to serve in the nation in which they practiced or acquired skills, while others claim that these individuals must be given freedom to work in any part of the world according to their own will. Although both the views have valid arguments, i firmly believe that working in a country that helped you achieve your goals is much more justified than being selfish and moving abroad in search of better opportunities.

Nowadays, some individuals consider that the graduates of different sectors must work in coordination for the betterment and improvement of the society, instead of seeking for chances to leave the country. This group of people are convinced with this view as they hold a belief that it is the duty of each and every graduate to pay back to the country in the form of services that they can provide by the skills, knowledge, and degree that they have acquired. Moreover, the local graduates are also highly aware of the sectors which lack resources in a country, so these professionals and experts can bring some lasting changes in the system by leading distinct sectors such as construction projects and educating fresh doctors and engineers. By doing so, the economy might also flourish as the government will not have to spend money hiring experts from foreign countries to operate advanced machines as the talent will already be present within a country.

Conversely, a different group suggests that all the individuals have a right to take their own decisions and no laws, such as visa problems, should be enforced on their careers. They think that the professionals must avail better available opportunities, and prioritize them over working in their native country as it can open doors to success and better knowledge, which might later be used to serve their nation in a better way by working at a lower cost or may be voluntarily for the country, for instance.

In conclusion, I personally consider that the professionals must contribute and serve in their country at least for a brief period as it is necessary to pay back the investment to a country by helping local public and solving their problems. Although a few people regard getting employed abroad as a relatively more practical choice, I consider these individuals must return to their local countries and should not neglect their national duties to serve the nation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal position. The ideas are relevant and generally well-supported, particularly the discussion on economic benefits and the duty to one's country. However, the development of the opposing view is slightly less nuanced, focusing heavily on personal freedom without fully exploring the global benefits of knowledge exchange. The conclusion reinforces the position well. To reach a higher band, ensure that the counter-arguments are explored with the same depth as the main argument, perhaps by discussing the benefits of international collaboration more explicitly.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate the introduction, the two body paragraphs, and the conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'Conversely', and 'In conclusion' are used appropriately to guide the reader. However, there is some minor repetition in the use of linking phrases, and the transition between sentences could occasionally be smoother. The referencing is generally clear, though some sentences are slightly wordy, which can momentarily obscure the logical flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is sufficient to convey ideas with reasonable precision. There is an attempt to use less common items such as 'flourish', 'prioritize', and 'neglect their national duties'. However, there are some instances of slightly unnatural collocation or word choice, such as 'seeking for chances' (should be 'seeking chances') and 'in coordination for the betterment' (which is a bit vague). While the range is adequate for the task, more sophisticated or idiomatic expressions would be needed to reach the higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical slips, such as the opening sentence structure ('wile some individuals think... while others claim' creates a redundant clause) and 'This group of people are' (should be 'is'). Additionally, there are minor punctuation and article errors throughout. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and refining complex sentence construction will help improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.