Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-18
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In this modern word,a common debate has emerged regarding that the experts should serve their own country rather than performing in counterpart.In contrast,other clearly opine that working in foreign provide good package.From my prospective i believe that placement according to the requirement can be done this will be beneficial.
According to some natives,they think that serving own nation is more advantageous,it also offers to reside with your families.Also,it is very hard to be oriented according to new environment,weather.Moreover,it is also fruitfull for the nation,residents. by boosting national economy and employment.moreover,they can invest that money which they will carry with themself into abroad ,in their own origin. for instance,if doctor or engineers planning to open their own business,as their business expands it directly leads to acquire more staff.this is a clearly sign of employment.
Alternative argue that migrating another part of world in purpose of good job oppercunities and better life Standard according to them,it is a good option because of income, the best way to grow quickly and it is spread your business new arms across the international borders.
Lam of the view that if the Scope in specific field is very limited and compitation is huge I prefer that individual Can think about moving to another country to meet the requirement. To exampilify, In India, majority of the individuals are engineers and they remained Unemployed because of overavailability. meanwhile, DUBAI need them they can reside to Soudi Arab to meet the requirements. This will beneficial for both nation and natives.
In Conclusion, I advocate that migrating according to requirement is good option. but, rejecting own country if better options available will cost you more.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument regarding the benefits of staying in one's home country is a list of points rather than a well-developed explanation. Similarly, the example provided about engineers in India and Dubai is relevant but lacks sufficient detail to fully support the argument. While the position is consistent, the essay would benefit from more depth and a more formal tone to fully meet the requirements of a higher band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'In contrast,other clearly opine' and 'Alternative argue' show a lack of control over linking words. Additionally, there are issues with punctuation, such as missing spaces after commas and periods, which disrupts the flow of ideas. While there is an overall progression, the transitions between sentences and paragraphs are sometimes abrupt or confusing, limiting the effectiveness of the logical flow.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'performing in counterpart', 'good package', and 'spread your business new arms'. Spelling errors are also frequent, including 'fruitfull', 'oppercunities', 'exampilify', and 'Soudi Arab'. These errors occasionally impede the reader's understanding. To reach a higher band, you should focus on using more precise collocations and ensuring accurate spelling of common academic terms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('DUBAI need them'), missing articles ('in purpose of', 'is a clearly sign'), and incorrect verb forms ('if doctor or engineers planning'). Punctuation is also a significant issue, with many sentences missing spaces after punctuation marks, which makes the text difficult to read. While the meaning is generally clear, the high density of errors prevents the response from reaching a higher band.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.