Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Individuals argue that doctors and engineers do thier job where they done their vocational training while other argue they should have a freedom to choose where they want if they want go to abroad then it is also good. This essay disscuse both view before presenting my point of view.

First of all, government often spend a large amount of public money on universities, training facilities and professional education. For example, if a government subsidies the education of doctores and engineers, requring them to work domestically for a few years could ensure that the country benifits from this investment. As a result, countries can retain skilled professional and reduce shorteges in important sectors.

On the other hand, professionals should have the freedom to choose where they live and work because international emplyoment can provide a better salaries, advaced technology and career development. For instance, a doctor trained in india may move to germany to access advaced medical facilities and gain international experience. Consequently, professionals can improve their skills and contribute to international knowledge-sharing.secondly,

government provides heavily subsidised medical education, graduates could be asked to serve in public hospitals for two or three years before moving abroad. This would allow the country to recover some of the investment while still respecting professionals long term career choices.

In conclusion, i belive professionals should generally be free to work abroad, although goverment can provide a subsidised for their better career and two to three year training programme in their own country before moving abroad

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic argument for domestic service and the professional development argument for international mobility. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The suggestion of a compromise in the conclusion is a good attempt at extending the argument, but the essay lacks depth in explaining the 'why' behind the government's investment beyond simple financial recovery. The position is clear throughout, but the overall development of ideas could be more robust to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'First of all', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion', which help the flow. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as the abrupt 'secondly,' appearing mid-paragraph. Referencing is generally clear, but the paragraphing structure is slightly disrupted by the placement of the second argument within the 'On the other hand' section. Overall, the progression of ideas is logical, but the management of cohesive devices lacks the flexibility required for a higher score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'vocational training', 'subsidies', and 'international knowledge-sharing'. However, there are several spelling errors ('thier', 'disscuse', 'benifits', 'shorteges', 'emplyoment', 'advaced', 'india', 'germany', 'goverment') and some minor collocation issues. These errors are noticeable and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not impede communication. To improve, the student should focus on proofreading for common spelling mistakes and expanding their range of academic collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('a large amount of public money', 'a subsidised'), subject-verb agreement ('government provides', 'professionals long term'), and verb tense/form ('where they done their vocational training', 'if a government subsidies'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing capital letters for proper nouns and some run-on sentences. These errors are frequent, though the meaning remains generally clear. A greater focus on basic grammatical accuracy and sentence construction is needed.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.