Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-21
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In this contemporary era, some people argue that workers from professional fields such as engineers, doctors and teachers, they should work in their own country where they skilled up and trained with experience, while other think that everyone should be free to go any country as per their will or work opportunity; whether they are common people or skilled. This essay discusses the both viewpoints before presenting a valid prospective.
Commencing with the viewpoint of the multitude of people why they believe that skilled individuals should work in their country. The first and foremost reason is boost economy. To put it more simply, if professional employees like doctors and engineer work in own country, they contribute to the welfare of the country and their earning and employment counted in nation's GDP. Moreover, this is particularly important for developing countries, where there may be shortage of skilled professionals. For example, if a significant number of doctors leave their home country after completing their education, hospitals may not able to provide adequate healthcare.
On the other hand, professionals should be free to work in any country as their wish. This is mainly because not only for good salaries but also for opportunities and better quality of life. People may move abroad for working conditions, career opportunities or advanced technologies and facilities. Additionally, they can enhance knowledge by working internationally with more skilled machines and individuals. This is not beneficial for them only but also for home country, they can be shared their knowledge.
In my opinion, professionals should not forced to remain in the country where they were trained. Although government encourage skilled individuals to work in their home nation as per good salaries and work condition, individual can be independent and free for where they build their career.
In conclusion, while working in trained country for retained investment of the nation, professionals can have freedom to do work any country of the world. For encouraging professional towards home country, government should works on the infrastructure, salaries, work culture and quality of life.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both viewpoints and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic impact of brain drain and the personal benefits of international mobility. However, the development is somewhat uneven. For instance, the argument regarding the home country benefiting from returning professionals is mentioned but not fully explored. The position is clear throughout, though the conclusion could have more effectively synthesised the arguments rather than simply restating them. Overall, the response meets the requirements for a Band 6.0, as it addresses the task well, but some points remain slightly under-developed.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is logically organised into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Commencing with', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'Commencing with the viewpoint of the multitude of people why they believe...'. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the phrase 'they can be shared their knowledge', where the pronoun usage is confusing. While the overall progression is coherent, the management of cohesive devices lacks the flexibility required for a higher band.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'GDP', 'professional fields', and 'infrastructure'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'skilled up', 'retained investment', and 'they can be shared their knowledge'. These errors do not impede communication but indicate a limited range of sophisticated vocabulary. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on more precise collocations and avoid informal phrasing in an academic context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, such as 'some people argue that workers... they should work', 'hospitals may not able to', and 'professionals should not forced'. These errors, particularly regarding subject-verb agreement and passive voice construction, are persistent. While the meaning remains clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from achieving a higher band. The student needs to focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and ensuring consistent verb forms in complex sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.