Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It's frequently argued that "some people believe that professionals should be work in the country where they did their training others believe they should be free to work in any country if the wish " has become an extremely significant and highly debated part of our modern daily lives. While a section of society views this unique perspective from positive and progressive angle others hold a completely different perspective regarding its long-term outcome. This essay will thoroughly discuss both sides of this crucial matter in great detail before presenting my own clear point of view on this significant matter.

I advocate the both opinion partially that professionals should be work in trainee country and also in that where they want.

On one hand there are several compeeling reasons why a large nmber of people supporting this particular idea in today's fast-paced society. To begin with it play a vital and constructive role in " professionals should be work in the country where they did their training which ultimately brings long term stability contionus development and overall economic growth to the country. Because the trainee country gave them support and also gave them abilities so they should provide their services it will be pleasure of them. Furthermore it provides professionals with much better safer and more reliable opportunities to succeed and allowing them to significantly improve their standard of living in trainee country and secure a stable future without facing major obstacles.

On the other hand, completely ignoring the alternative perspective or failing to evaluate the counter argument can lead sometimes unforseen and difficult challenges. Critics and expert often argue that taking a rigid stance without considering opposite outcomes might creates serious imbalance in daily routine working habits and community structure. So if the want to go to any country they should be free because if they become free they get better experience and highly progress and become more professional. So therefore a careful logical and objective evalution of both sides is essential to ensure that our decision do not result in long term negative consequences for the upcoming professionals.

In conclusion I advocate that if country need these professionals and they are necessary for country so they should work for country and if there is not essential for country so in this situation they should be free.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument, but the development of ideas is limited and often repetitive. The introduction is problematic as it copies the prompt verbatim, which does not count toward your band score. While you present a position, the reasoning is somewhat superficial; for example, the argument that professionals should stay because the country 'gave them support' is a valid point, but it lacks depth or specific examples. The conclusion is a bit simplistic, merely restating the prompt rather than synthesizing the main points. To improve, focus on expanding your arguments with concrete examples and ensuring your introduction is written in your own words.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the flow between ideas is often mechanical. You use some cohesive devices like 'On one hand' and 'Furthermore,' but they are sometimes used incorrectly or in a way that feels forced. The referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly in the second paragraph where the repetition of the prompt makes the progression difficult to follow. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs lacks logical cohesion, making it hard for the reader to follow the development of your argument. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear topic sentence will help.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. You rely on basic phrasing and repeat certain words like 'country' and 'professionals' frequently. There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'trainee country' and 'highly progress.' While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of sophisticated vocabulary and the reliance on simple, repetitive structures limits your score. To improve, try to incorporate more academic synonyms and focus on using words in their correct collocations rather than translating directly from your native language.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the essay, including issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'professionals should be work'), missing articles, and incorrect verb forms. Sentence structures are often simple or contain errors when you attempt complex constructions. For instance, 'if the want to go to any country they should be free' contains a spelling error and lacks proper punctuation. These errors are frequent and occasionally cause the reader to pause, though they do not completely impede communication. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement will significantly improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.