Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Certain individuals argue that occupations like physician and engineers have to work in thier own country where they develoed their skills, while other argue they should have a own freedom to choose where they want to work. This essay discuss both view before presenting my own prespective.
On the one hand, government often invest subsantial public funds in educating doctors, engineers and other specialist. Therefore, it is resonable to expect these individuals to contribute to their nations development in return. For instance, developing country, there is often shortage of the skilled employe. if trained doctors move abroad then it can worse healthcare system and negatively affect public welfare. thus, enforcing such a policy could help maintain essential services and ensure a return on educational investment.
On the other hand, restricting professional's freedom to work abroad may be unfair and counterproductive. Individuals should have the right to decide thier career path and seek better opportunities. For example, many engineers move to developed countries to gain exposure to cutting edge Technology and innovation. This international experiance can later benefit their home country if they choose to return.
In my opinion, i belive that qualified worker have the right for career opportunities. They can choose their pathway with own prespective it leads to offer gain expreriance and career benefits such as better life style development.
In conclusion, government should spend a money for further boosts the skilled citizen it can help for the development for the country and specialist should have the rights for the choose their career pathway.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The essay addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both perspectives and providing a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While the first body paragraph provides a logical argument regarding public investment, the second body paragraph and the conclusion are less developed. The personal opinion in the fourth paragraph is slightly repetitive and lacks depth in its justification. To improve, ensure that each argument is supported by more detailed explanations or specific examples, rather than just stating the point. The response meets the requirements of the task, but the depth of analysis is consistent with a mid-range band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' are used to signal the structure of the argument. However, the flow between sentences is sometimes mechanical, and there are instances where referencing is slightly unclear, such as in the final paragraph where the connection between 'spending money' and 'boosting the skilled citizen' is disjointed. Paragraphing is used appropriately, but the overall progression of ideas could be smoother with more sophisticated linking words and better sentence-to-sentence cohesion.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, covering the topic of professional training and migration. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'substantial public funds' and 'cutting edge', which are used correctly. However, there are several spelling errors ('thier', 'develoed', 'resonable', 'expreriance') and some awkward word choices ('worse healthcare system' instead of 'worsen'). While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the meaning, the frequency of spelling and collocation errors prevents a higher score. Focusing on proofreading and learning standard collocations would be beneficial.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('a shortage', 'the healthcare system'), subject-verb agreement ('government should spend a money'), and preposition usage. Punctuation is generally functional, but the sentence structure is occasionally fragmented or run-on, such as in the final paragraph. The errors are noticeable and sometimes require the reader to re-read to understand the intended meaning, though they do not completely impede communication. More attention to basic grammar rules and sentence construction is needed.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.