Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It often to argued that professionals, like doctors and engineers should staty at their country after their training.While others believe that authorities should be give them freedom to chose their destiations.This essay will discuss both and also give my own opinion.
on the one hand, there are some reasons why people want graduates should stay at their home country. First, government invest huge money for train them properly.Therefore, they must be give treatment at their country and help other individuals to learn skills.Moreover, some countries are poor and undevelopment . If in this countries graduates leave their home, as a result, the country will never grow up and become development. For example, if higher skilled engineers work at local comapnies then the company dont need to hierd foreing expert for their work and it also save money.
On the other hand , others believe that they should be free to work anywhere and i also agree with that they should be free to move another country if they want.Because, everyone want to lead better life and expected earn higher salary thats why expert moved to developed country .Moreover, some individuals go to developed country for learn higher skilled and also for their children better educations. As a result, when the expert came back from abroad after 5,10 years with better experience and higher skilled than they should be developed their with their skill.
In conclusion, although making professionals work in their training country has some benefits for the local community, I still think that freedom of choice is more important. Governments should give them better salaries so that they will want to stay willingly.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding government investment is relevant but lacks depth, and the explanation of why professionals move abroad is a bit repetitive. While the prompt is addressed, the supporting points could be more fully extended with more specific examples or logical consequences to reach a higher band. The position is consistent throughout, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points while offering a practical suggestion.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'on the one hand', 'moreover', and 'in conclusion' are used to signal the progression of ideas. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical, and there are instances where the flow is interrupted by awkward phrasing or grammatical errors. Referencing is generally clear, but the transition between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother to improve the overall coherence of the argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. There are several instances of word-choice errors, such as 'undevelopment' instead of 'underdeveloped' and 'hierd' instead of 'hire'. The student relies on basic vocabulary and struggles with collocations, such as 'give treatment' instead of 'provide services' or 'medical care'. While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of variety and the presence of spelling errors limit the score in this criterion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('government invest', 'everyone want'), incorrect verb forms ('should be give', 'should be developed their'), and missing articles. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are persistent and occur in both simple and complex sentences. A greater focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and sentence structure would significantly improve the quality of the writing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.