Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is an ongoing debate regarding people professions. Some people believe that they should serve for the same country where they took their coaching and complete their training, while others contend that people should be free without boundations to choose their dream place and look for career opportutnities. I will discuss my opinion below that why having no limitation would lead greater results.

To illustrates the main ideal approach where serving for a nation built profound conncetion and a loyalty for the government and people. Moreover, they aware of the local culture and languages and that makes it easy for them to connect with patients and focus on the main root of a problem. Furthermore, not only it benefits them to spend lesiure time with family and friends but also enables them to be a part of a country economical growth by contributing in taxes. Additionally, all these factors proves the advantage of choosing the native place or the place where you granted the practices.

despite having positive side it leads detrimental impacts. Such as, it limits their growth by staying at one place can pottentially harm their career pace. Moving into developed country and hightect cities will boost their financial condition and enhace their lifestyle. Pupils often pick a route where they look for effective ways to get promotion and implement their salary package, exchange rate in curreny can benefits them by giving high return as dollars value more than any other currency this moment.

In conclusion, both statements are valid at their own place but human race should not be left behind by labelling responsibility of a nation on their shoulders, a doctor, engineer are ubiquitos role and so paramount which can be done by all around the world.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument regarding 'loyalty' and 'local culture' is mentioned but not fully explored with specific examples. The second body paragraph discusses the benefits of moving abroad, but the points are slightly disjointed. While the task is addressed, the ideas lack the depth required for a higher band. The conclusion is a bit abrupt and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented, though it does restate the writer's position.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion'. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly inaccurate, such as 'To illustrates the main ideal approach' (grammatical error) and 'despite having positive side it leads detrimental impacts'. The flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by these errors, which makes the progression of ideas feel a bit forced at times. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs could be more cohesive.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are frequent errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'boundations' (non-standard), 'opportutnities', 'lesiure', 'hightect', and 'ubiquitos'. While the student attempts to use more sophisticated terms like 'detrimental impacts' and 'paramount', the overall range is limited. The errors in spelling and word formation are noticeable and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not completely impede communication. To improve, the student needs to focus on accurate spelling and more precise collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, such as 'I will discuss my opinion below that why having no limitation would lead greater results' and 'all these factors proves the advantage'. Subject-verb agreement and preposition usage are inconsistent. While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. The student should focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and sentence structure accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.