Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people argue that highly skilled professionals like doctors and engineers should be legally required to work in the nation where they received their education.i believe that a balanced approach using temporary service agreements is fairer than a total ban or unrestricted migration.

On the one hand, there are significant reasons why governments wish to retain trained professionals.educating medical and engineering students requires massive public funding and state-subsidized resources.wheb these graduate migrate

Immediately after finishing their degrees, the home country experiences a severe "brain drain" and loses its return on investment.

On the other hand, defenders of professional mobility argue that forcing people to stay violets fundamental human rights. Individual should have to the freedom to pursue better career opportunities higher living standards and advance research facilities abroad. Further more the global exchange of talent forests international innovations and collaborations for instance Indian and Chinese engineers migrating to silicon valley have driving global technology break through that ultimately benefits the entire world restricting these movement could steeple personal growth and global progress.

In my opinion both perspective fold married and a compromise is necessary instead of enforcing and outwright lifetime than or align unconditional immigrations government should implement mandatory public service periods for example is sponsored students could be required to work locally for 3 to 5 years old graduation after full filling this national service day should be free to migrate internationally if they choose.

In conclusion while Nations have a legitimate right to protect their public investment in education professional also deserve personal and career freedom of policy of temporary mandatory service strike the perfect balance between national development and individual Liberty.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both perspectives and providing a clear, personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and well-developed, particularly the argument regarding 'brain drain' and the benefits of global mobility. The proposed compromise of mandatory service periods is a thoughtful and logical extension of the discussion. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion effectively synthesizes the main points. To reach a higher band, ensure that all arguments are fully explored with slightly more depth, though the current level of development is sufficient for a strong score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two viewpoints and the author's own opinion. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to guide the reader. However, there are some minor issues with punctuation and sentence flow that occasionally make the progression feel slightly mechanical. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would enhance the overall flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally appropriate for the task, with some good topic-specific terms such as 'brain drain', 'state-subsidized', and 'professional mobility'. There are, however, several spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'violets' instead of 'violates', 'forests' instead of 'fosters', and 'fold married' instead of 'hold merit'. These errors do not impede communication, but they do indicate a need for more careful proofreading and a wider range of precise vocabulary to reach the higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts to use complex sentences, there are frequent errors in punctuation, capitalization, and basic grammar (e.g., 'Individual should have to the freedom', 'these movement could steeple'). Some sentences are run-on or lack necessary punctuation, which affects the clarity of the writing. To improve, the student should focus on subject-verb agreement, correct use of articles, and ensuring that complex sentences are punctuated correctly to avoid confusion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.