Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Without any iota of doubt, work plays an important role in our life for survival. Few individuals think that experts, like surgeon and builder, need to do job in the nation where they did their coaching,some think they must be free to work in other region where they want. This essay will not just explain both views but also my opinion.

Apparently, there are countless points to withstand first view, but the major one is that they can easily communicate with other individuals of their nation. To explain it more, if experts start doing job in country where they study, it is very easy for them to work well, because they spent time in that region and they know the problems and needs of local people. So, they can easily solve the issues of local residents and give them appropriate facilities and results. For example, a doctor who belong to Delhi, know about the environment in Delhi, it is quite easy for a doctor to give medicine to patient according to their surrounding.

However, there are a lot of views to second view, but the important one is that, job in other region means more wages. To justify it more, when person start doing in other region, like America, where the dollar rate is very high, it directly, impacts the income of person. Moreover, work in other country help experts to gain more experience and learn new things that they cannot see in their country, by meeting with new people they can easily gain skills, for instance, communication skills, critical thinking, exchange thoughts and problem solving skills. Which open up new career opportunities for individuals.

In my opinion, I believe that doing work where individual want to more good and give a lot of benefits to person.

To conclude, doing job in native country is better because it is easy for people to do it, however working in other country provide more wages to individual.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both views and provides an opinion, though the development is somewhat superficial. The arguments regarding local knowledge and higher wages are relevant but lack depth and specific, well-integrated examples. The opinion is stated but is not clearly integrated into the essay structure, appearing as a brief, isolated sentence. To improve, you should expand on your reasoning with more sophisticated analysis and ensure your position is clearly articulated and maintained throughout the entire response, including the conclusion. The current conclusion is repetitive and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or repetitive (e.g., 'To explain it more', 'To justify it more'). Some transitions are awkward, such as 'Apparently, there are countless points to withstand first view'. The progression of ideas is sometimes hindered by these simplistic linkers. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of cohesive devices more naturally and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, logical flow that connects back to the main thesis.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. There are several instances of unnatural word choices, such as 'coaching' instead of 'training', 'builder' instead of 'engineer', and 'do job' instead of 'work'. The phrasing is often repetitive, and there is a lack of topic-specific collocations related to professional migration or economic development. To improve, focus on learning academic collocations and synonyms for common words. Avoid informal phrasing like 'iota of doubt' and focus on using more precise terminology relevant to the professional context of the prompt.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include missing articles (e.g., 'in country where they study'), subject-verb agreement errors (e.g., 'a doctor who belong to Delhi'), and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'doing work where individual want to more good'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, specifically article usage and verb agreement, before attempting more complex structures. Proofreading for these recurring errors would significantly improve the overall accuracy of your writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.