Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In many countries, the popularity of professional job placements like doctors and engineers has fundamentally rised throughout a few decade. It is often argued that those professional jobs should be required to work in specific nation where they got educated. While some indiviudals contend that they should be have broader freedom to work in various countries depend on their preferences.

This essay will discuss both views, and them I will state my perspective.

On the one hand, the value of extended careers for professionals lie primarily in the opportunities it creates valuable exposure to the corporate nations. For instance, in a highly competitive job market, some countries like South Korea, Japan recorded the limited number of seats in medical university. To illustrate, some country like UK only resume 5 years degree of doctor which takes shorter duration compared to other countries. During their long-term degree program, the majority of professionals are expected to complete demanding assignments, prepare for examinations, repeat pratical experiments to their broder development. Regarding with the advancement of education quality, every nation will substantially gain pros from the surged by professionals within domestics' economic growth.

Additionally, with enhancing domestic regulation like working visa, it is evitably increase

On the other hand, some other proponents believe that different level of education or examination credit standard might cause confusion and predicament. The significant concern is that every nation recognize with different standard of becoming professionals which should be excessively cautious allowing them to work in another country. To demonstrate, when professionals passed qualification with different levels of exam, it inevitably leads to strong disagreement of domestic's professionals.

I firmly believe that country should be restrict the other peoples

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to address both views and provide a personal opinion, but the execution is severely compromised by incomplete sentences and trailing thoughts. For instance, the prompt asks to discuss whether professionals should work in their home country versus abroad, but the student's essay cuts off abruptly in the middle of sentences, such as 'Additionally, with enhancing domestic regulation like working visa, it is evitably increase' and 'I firmly believe that country should be restrict the other peoples'. Because these points are left completely unfinished, the overall development of ideas is heavily disrupted and the position cannot be fully established. This corresponds closely to Band 5, where the task is only partially addressed and ideas remain underdeveloped or incomplete.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is divided into an introduction and two body paragraphs, establishing a basic structure. However, the logical progression breaks down due to incomplete thoughts and abrupt endings. While basic cohesive devices are attempted, such as 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand', referencing and logical flow become unclear when sentences trail off mid-thought. Paragraphing is present, but the lack of completion within the paragraphs prevents a clear overall progression. This fits the Band 5 descriptor, which notes some organisation but lacks clear overall progression, with faulty or inadequate cohesion in places.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'fundamentally rised', 'demanding assignments', and 'qualification'. However, there are noticeable word choice and collocation errors, such as 'popularity of professional job placements' and 'corporate nations'. Furthermore, awkward phrasing and incorrect forms like 'indiviudals' and 'pratical' detract from the quality of writing. Because these lexical errors are noticeable and occasionally cause difficulty for the reader without entirely obscuring meaning, the vocabulary performance aligns with Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences frequently result in serious structural errors and ungrammatical fragments. Examples include 'those professional jobs should be required to work', 'they should be have broader freedom', and sentences that terminate prematurely without a main clause, such as 'it is evitably increase'. Frequent errors in verb tense, voice, and sentence completeness cause significant difficulty for the reader and obscure the intended meaning. This performance is characteristic of Band 5, where frequent errors in grammar occur and attempts at complex structures are consistently faulty.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.