Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Now a days it is often argued that professionals like doctors and engineerd should work in their country where they recieved their training.Some people believe they should be free of choice to work in different acountry if they are willing to do so.

However i completely agree with this point of view because professionals should work in different country as they get many better opportunities to serve and make our country feel proud. This essay will analyze this issue from both perspectives before reaching a logical conclusion.

ON the other hand the primary reason why i believe professionals like doctors and engineers from any department should be given an opportunity to work in another country as it helps professionals to reach a dream of their life or to achieve more success eventually. To work outside in different country government must implement some schemes so people gain interest and work or study abroad as it helps professionals to learn new skills courses or techniques and a better way of understanding more deeply. For example USA is describe land of opportunities for work or study people will reach high level of success and it is a proud moment for our country as a person from our nation has achieved enormous success and got chance to work with foreign professionals.

On the other hand another compelling factor to consider professionals should work in same country where they got trained it is expected mostly by people as they got a chance to serve nation as well as help needy people or low economic person.As it can even secure a good future to professionals but many people dream of working in foreign. A prime example of this can be seen many different professionals keen to work in differnt foreign countries but due to financial problems, health issue or any other family pressure let people to stay back at their hometown and lead their goals here itself.Therefore it can be argued that both views have their own way of perspective.

In conclusion i firmly maintain professionals must be encouraged to work in foreign countries this is due to the fact that AI is developing more and in different countries new technology is used in far better way which gives professionals new way of consciousness to deal with situations.Looking ahead it is should be highly recommended by government to provide schemes or medical practices in foreign countries to learn a handful of proper technology advancements skills.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the task by discussing the views of professionals working in their home country versus moving abroad, and it includes a clear personal position. However, the development of ideas is somewhat repetitive and lacks depth. For instance, the argument that moving abroad helps professionals achieve success is stated multiple times without introducing distinct sub-arguments or robust examples. The example of the USA as a 'land of opportunities' is quite generalized and underdeveloped. Furthermore, there is some confusion in the phrasing of the introduction, where the student claims to completely agree with working in a different country, yet later discusses both sides. Despite these limitations, the main prompt requirements are met, earning a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear attempts at paragraphing, separating the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the logical progression is flawed, notably by using the transition phrase 'On the other hand' twice to introduce two separate paragraphs (one supporting working abroad and the other supporting staying home). This misuse of cohesive devices disrupts the flow of argument. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as pronoun ambiguity in sentences like 'As it can even secure a good future to professionals...'. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion is mechanical rather than fluid, placing this response firmly at a Band 5.5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The lexical range is adequate for the task, allowing the student to convey their basic arguments about working abroad and staying in the home country. There are several spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'engineerd', 'recieved', 'acountry', and 'differnt', along with awkward collocations like 'low economic person'. While the student attempts less common vocabulary such as 'enormous success' and 'technological advancements', the presence of noticeable spelling and lexical errors creates some difficulty for the reader and prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Overall, the vocabulary demonstrates a Band 5.5 level of control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, featuring clauses introduced by words like 'because', 'although', and 'due to the fact that'. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in punctuation, capitalization (e.g., 'ON the other hand', 'Now a days'), and basic syntax, such as 'it is should be highly recommended'. Run-on sentences and comma splices also occur, for example: 'A prime example of this can be seen many different professionals keen to work in differnt foreign countries but due to financial problems... let people to stay back'. These errors frequently cause strain and misreadings for the reader, aligning with Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.