Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Undoubtedly, it is a true fact that technology has taken globalisation to new heights. A small number of individuals opine that professional healthcare officials and technologists should work in the nation where they receive their education whereas others consider they should be given the freedom to work in the country of their own choice. I partially agree with the given statement due to some notable factors.
On the one hand, why it is essential for professionals to stay in their own country or where they studied. First and the most notable reason is
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
The student's response is severely under-length, containing only 93 words compared to the minimum requirement of 250 words. Because the text breaks off mid-sentence ('First and the most notable reason is') and fails to develop either side of the argument or present a complete discussion, the task is only addressed in the most minimal fashion. The introduction outlines the topic and provides a partial stance ('I partially agree'), but the total lack of body paragraph development means that the requirements of the prompt are largely unfulfilled. Consequently, this severely limits the Task Achievement score, which falls under Band 4 due to the incomplete nature of the response.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
In terms of structure and cohesion, the student demonstrates some ability to organise an introduction with introductory linking phrases such as 'Undoubtedly' and 'On the one hand'. However, because the text cuts off abruptly after only a few sentences, it is impossible to evaluate paragraphing fully or judge overall progression and the logical linking of ideas. The cohesive devices present at the start function adequately, but the incomplete nature of the writing prevents any sustained flow or extended development. Therefore, the coherence and cohesion of the piece cannot rise beyond a Band 5, as the structural framework is left entirely unfinished.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The writer attempts some appropriate academic vocabulary, such as 'globalisation', 'professionals', and 'healthcare officials'. These choices show a basic awareness of topic-specific lekisis suited to an academic essay. However, the extremely short sample size (93 words) provides a very limited range of vocabulary to assess accurately. There are no major spelling or word-choice errors in the text produced, but the lack of extended output restricts the lexical variety. Based on the language demonstrated, the vocabulary is minimally adequate for the small amount written, fitting a Band 5.0 level.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The student manages to construct a few error-free sentences in the opening paragraph, including a complex structure ('A small number of individuals opine that... whereas others consider...'). The control over basic grammar and sentence boundaries in the completed sentences is reasonably good. However, the piece ends mid-sentence, reflecting a complete lack of a varied range of complex structures across a full essay. Because the text is truncated so early, the overall grammatical range is extremely limited, capping the score at Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.