Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Working, saving and spanding are the three major expect of human life. In bygone era, there were less option for masses to work in other nation, whereas in this day and age, opportunity for folks to work in multination companies is esalating by leaps and bounds. It is highly debatable whether professional workers should work in that nation where they did training or any other country. I shall discuss both view in upcoming segments.

The predominat reason why professional worker should be required to work in the country where they did training is regime investment should be protected. For instance, Governments often spend a lot of money training doctors, engineers and other professionals and this money comes from partly taxpayers. As a result, these professionals leave immediately after training, the country may not benefit from its investment. Besides this, it can reduce shortages of skilled workers. A good illustration of that is, developing countries often have fewer doctors, engineers and other specialists. Hence, this is especially important in rural or disadvantaged areas.

As,"beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder" Likewise, some commentators opine that professional worker ought to be free to work in any nation. Firstly, better career opportunities. To explicate, other countries may offer higher salaries, better facilities and more advanced technology. So, working abroad can help professionals develop new skills and gain international experience. Moreover, . People have the right to choose their careers. To illustrate,

professionals spend many years studying and training and they should have the freedom to decide where they want to live and work which ought to be restricted their personal and professional growth.

To sum up, all the above mentioned arguments in a nutshell, it is concluded that everyone have right to choose the career in any region.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views—that professionals should work where trained and that they should be free to move—and provides a personal opinion in the conclusion. However, the development of ideas is limited and under-developed. For instance, the arguments regarding government investment and brain drain in developing countries are raised but lack sufficient extension or detailed examples. Furthermore, the final paragraph contradicts the earlier balanced presentation by abruptly stating a definitive opinion without full integration into the body. While the prompt is partially addressed, the ideas remain somewhat restricted and lack the fully extended support characteristic of a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is a basic organization to the essay, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, and paragraphs are generally used to signal shifts in topic. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the logical flow is frequently disrupted by mechanical and inadequate cohesive devices. Phrases like 'As,'beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder' Likewise,' are inappropriately used and impede smooth transitions. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as orphaned conjunctions and disjointed sentences like 'Moreover, . People have the right to choose their careers.' Paragraphing is attempted, but the structural integration between sentences and paragraphs is repetitive and lacks cohesive harmony.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate basic ideas about professional migration. There are noticeable lexical errors and awkward word choices throughout the text, such as 'spanding' instead of spending, 'expect' instead of aspect, 'esalating' instead of escalating, and 'predominat' instead of predominant. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but issues with spelling, word form, and collocation occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. For instance, phrases like 'regime investment should be protected' demonstrate inaccurate lexical selection that prevents the response from achieving a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on simple constructions alongside faulty attempts at complex sentences. There are frequent grammatical errors that can cause difficulty for the reader, including issues with subject-verb agreement and missing articles or prepositions, such as 'everyone have right' instead of 'everyone has the right'. Punctuation and structural integration are also flawed, seen in incomplete clauses and dangling modifiers like 'which ought to be restricted their personal and professional growth.' The control of grammatical patterns is inconsistent, meaning that complex clauses frequently contain errors rather than being produced with high accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.