Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is often argued by some that professionals fields, such as doctor and engineers should be needed to duty in the own nation where they did their internships or training as local communities often suffer from shortage of professional field workers as well as government often provide subsidize to higher education. Others opine that they have freedom to work in another country if they want because the lack of facilities or oppertunities in professional fields where they are graduated. This essay will discuss both the points of view before explaining my own opinion.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some individuals believe that professional field workers required to work in the same country where they get a training. One key reason is that local communities often suffer acute shortage of doctors and engineers, especially in rural areas. To be more precise, rural hospitals and infrastructure projects are suffering from a lack of doctors and enginners. Besides this, higher education in medicines and engineering is heavily subsidized by public taxprayers. In other words, if government invests some society funds on developing the facilities and infrastructures, which can be beneficial for professional workers who gain experiences and skills for their duties during training period. Consequently, number of people think that professional workers should be required to work in the home country and serve their duites among the local people.
On the other hand, others advocate that they should be free to work in another nations where they want. If the home country provides lower amount of salaries package, then they moved to abroad for higher salaries and improve their lifestyles. Apart from this, gaining global experience and develop advanced skills from developed countries. In other words, in today's time, the advanced technological machines and instruments are introduced for better productivity and improves the practical knowledge in a particular department. That's why, many professional workers are moving to another country for improving their knowledge in both terms, theoretical or practical.
In conclusion, although preventing talent loss and invest society's funds in the right way is more suitable, restricting human freedom that cannot be an ideal solution. I support the balanced approach due to national authority develop some kinds of facilities in professional fields and preventing the loss of talent as well as it is a favorable way to avoid the shortage of doctors and engineers.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—that professionals should stay in their home countries and that they should be free to migrate—while also providing an opinion in the introduction and conclusion. A clear position is maintained throughout the essay. However, some ideas are more fully developed than others. For instance, the discussion on subsidies and infrastructure in the second body paragraph is somewhat repetitive and less elaborated than the points about salaries and global experience in the third paragraph. To reach a higher band, all main ideas would need to be equally extended, supported with more precise examples, and seamlessly integrated with a fully developed personal stance.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear, logical progression of ideas from introduction to body paragraphs and conclusion, fully satisfying the requirements of the lower band and touching upon elements of the next. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, with each paragraph having a distinct central topic. Cohesive devices are employed to connect ideas, such as 'On the one hand', 'Besides this', and 'In conclusion'. However, referencing and cohesion can occasionally feel mechanical or slightly repetitive, and transitional phrases are sometimes overused or formulaic. To progress further, the writer needs to ensure that cohesive devices are used more flexibly and unobtrusively, and that referencing between sentences remains consistently clear.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The response uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common and topic-specific items such as 'subsidized', 'infrastructure', and 'global experience'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and collocation throughout the text, such as 'professionals fields' instead of 'professional fields', 'doctor' instead of 'doctors', 'salaries package' instead of 'salary packages', and 'moved to abroad' instead of 'move abroad'. There are also occasional spelling slips, such as 'oppertunities'. While these errors do not seriously impede communication, they prevent the writer from achieving a higher band. To improve, the writer should focus on mastering word forms, collocations, and precise lexical choices.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an attempt at varied structures such as conditional clauses and relative clauses. There are some errors in grammar and punctuation, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'professionals fields, such as doctor and engineers should be needed to duty', article omissions, and awkward prepositional phrases like 'invest some society funds on developing'. Despite these frequent minor slips, the sentences remain generally understandable and rarely impede communication. To move to the next band, the writer must increase the proportion of error-free sentences, exercise better control over complex grammatical structures, and refine punctuation and article usage.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.