Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Without doctors citizen cannot imagine their healthy lifeperiod.For this purpose, a handful of individuals trust that prefessionals, like doctors and engineers, must be required to work in the nation where they did training but, other believe that they should be leisure to do work in any region if thry wish. Therefore, i will scrutinize both views with relevant examples ang givr my opinion eventually.

To embark with the myriad benefits of doing work in their training place. First and foremost,better oppournity. To elaborate it, in that place many industries know about that side where inhabitants get skills and get as their staff. To exemplify, when citizen get their professionals knowledge from big megapolis and they definately do job in that place due to giving many opportunity from there, Thus, they do not go any where for find work. Secondly, filled shortage of skilled people beacause, in owm county their are some lack of higher professionals doctor and engineers if they do in own nation this can become developing ones. Hence, it is better for beginners future.

Moving further,there are also numerous merits about doing work on other regions. Predominantly, better career option. To illustrate it, in forgien nation doctor and engineer profession have higher salries if they go their they earn better and also gain knowledge about other people. For an instance, an engineer may transfer to abroad for advancement technology and they also gain some international experiences. Thus, they enhance they knowledge about their work. Moreover, personal freedom because, when they move there they have freedom andf they have proper schedule for job. Hence, they do not suffer from stress and anxiety.

To recapitulate it there are many merits regarding doing work in same place such as; better oppournity and filled shortage. However, many pros for going abroad like; better career option and personal freedom.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response addresses the prompt partially, discussing both views regarding professionals working in their training country versus abroad, and presents a personal opinion in the introduction. However, the development of ideas is limited and under-developed throughout the body paragraphs. For example, while the writer mentions the benefit of filling local shortages and gaining better career options abroad, these points are supported with vague generalisations rather than fully extended arguments or concrete examples. The position is stated, but the overall treatment of the task remains basic and lacks the depth required for a higher level, placing this aspect of the writing firmly within the lower intermediate category.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some basic organisation with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a brief conclusion, indicating an attempt at a logical structure. However, there is no clear overall progression as the ideas jump between points rather than flowing smoothly. Cohesive devices are used, but they are frequently repetitive, mechanical, or awkward in their application, such as starting multiple sentences with 'To elaborate it,' 'To exemplify,' or 'Moving further.' Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal cohesion within paragraphs is weak, meaning the reader occasionally has to work harder to follow the intended argument. Referencing is also sometimes unclear, which pulls the structural quality down into the middle band range.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for discussing the general topic of professionals migrating or staying. There are noticeable errors in word choice, word formation, and spelling that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader, such as 'prefessionals', 'leisure' instead of free, 'oppournity', 'megapolis', 'forgien', and 'salries'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary like 'scrutinize' and 'advancement', but the execution shows a lack of precision and control. Collocations are often unnatural, reflecting a restricted lexical range that stays constrained to basic and repetitive expressions throughout the text.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The grammatical structures deployed show a limited range, relying heavily on simple sentences or attempts at complex sentences that are frequently faulty. There are persistent, frequent errors in basic grammar, including missing or incorrect articles ('a handful of individuals', 'in forgien nation'), poor subject-verb agreement ('citizen cannot', 'their are some lack'), incorrect prepositions ('do work on other regions'), and faulty punctuation. For instance, run-on structures and incorrect comma splices appear regularly. While the meaning can generally be parsed with effort, the high frequency of grammatical inaccuracies across multiple sentence patterns restricts the writing to this level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.