Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people think that professionals,such as doctors and engineer should be essential to practice in the country where they did their training, while others feel they should be free to work in any country of thier choice.

Overall, while it's necessary for professionals such as doctors and engineers to work in the nation where they received their education because they already used to the country and know the area they need need adquate attention to, on the other hand, allowing professionals to migrate and work in any nation they wish will enable them to put more effort and determined to their working places.

Furthermore, when a skilled workers such as engineers and medical doctors work in the state that they received their formal education, it will make work and promotion easier for them because people will be recommendind them due to they are well known in the area. Also, it will help them to pay back to the society, for example, some of them that state government or federal government sponsored their training.

However, it's also important that professional should be free to practice in another country if they wish because this will help them to acquire internationl experience that will benefits the people in the future. When they are allow to relocate to other places of their choice, this will motivate them to put all their zeals in their work. For instance, a medical doctor that want to migrate to Uk will be happy to achieve his aim and put all his effort in his work.

In conclusion, although professionals practicing in the home town where they receive their training because they already used to the system and know where attention is needed, while migrating to another nation will give them international knowledge that will help their country in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether professionals should work in their training country and provides a personal opinion. However, the task is only partially addressed because the ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the argument about international experience is mentioned briefly without sufficient explanation or specific examples of how it benefits the home country. The position is stated, but the lack of fully elaborated arguments and support keeps the response at this level. Additionally, 8 words copied from the prompt were not counted towards the minimum length, though the overall response comfortably exceeds the word requirement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is a basic structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing some overall organisation. However, there is a lack of clear progression throughout the essay, particularly in the concluding sentence which trails off into a fragmented structure. Cohesive devices are used, but they are frequently repetitive or mechanical, such as the repeated reliance on transitional phrases like 'Furthermore' and 'However'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within paragraphs suffers from run-on sentences and unclear referencing, such as 'some of them that state government...' which disrupts the logical flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey basic ideas about professionals migrating. There are noticeable errors in word choice, form, and collocation that cause some difficulty for the reader, such as 'engineer' instead of the plural 'engineers', 'thier', 'internationl', and 'zeals'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary like 'adequate attention' and 'acquire international experience', but these are often awkwardly phrased or contain spelling inaccuracies that reveal a lack of precise control over lexical features.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer uses a limited range of structures, relying mostly on long, cumbersome sentences joined by coordinating or subordinating conjunctions. Attempts at complex sentence forms are frequently faulty, leading to grammatical errors in verb forms, tense consistency, and prepositions. Examples include 'doctor that want to migrate', 'When they are allow', and the final sentence which lacks a main verb and reads as an incomplete dependent clause. Frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article usage persist throughout the text and occasionally cause strain for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.