Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they received their training. Others argue that these individuals should be free to work in another country if they wish. While working in the training country can benefit society, I believe that professionals should have the freedom to choose where they want to work.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why professionals should do their job or business in their homeland where they had done training. The main reason is that the Government had invested a significant amount of money on their educational and academic institutions, so if skilled people go abroad , it will be disadvantageous for a state. Moreover, experts can serve to state's economic growth by doing business and jobs in their homeland, which will decrease unemployment rate noticeably. For instance, experts, such as, doctors can open a clinic, that will adequate patients, and will provide wider range of job opportunities. As a result, there will be gradual increase in the economic growth.

On the other hand, many people believe that professionals should be allowed to work overseas. The main reason is that other countries may offer better salaries and career opportunities. Working abroad can also help professionals to gain valuable international experience and exposure. Moreover, individuals should have the right to decide where they want to live and develop their careers. For instance, an engineer may move to another country to work on larger projects and acquire skills that could improve their future career prospects.

In conclusion, although working in a mother state can be beneficial, right to work on their own is advantageous for skilled individuals. I believe that experts should have the freedom of where they want to work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses both views and gives a clear opinion: the introduction supports professionals’ freedom to choose, and the conclusion restates this position. The arguments are relevant, including public investment in training, employment and economic growth, as well as better salaries, career opportunities and international experience. The example of an engineer working on larger projects helps illustrate the second view. This meets the task well, but development is uneven: the first view receives several linked claims, while the second is supported mainly by general benefits and one brief example. The clinic example is also not fully explained, particularly how it would create wider employment. To strengthen the response further, develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or specific illustration.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the structure easy to follow, and the ideas generally progress logically within each paragraph. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical because the paragraphs rely heavily on repeated “The main reason” and “Moreover.” Some links between claims are also abrupt; for example, the clinic example moves quickly from treating patients to providing job opportunities and economic growth without explaining the connection. The conclusion repeats the position but does not neatly summarise the two arguments. Use a wider range of linking methods and make the relationship between examples and claims explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “skilled people,” “economic growth,” “career opportunities,” “international experience,” and “career prospects.” These choices communicate the main ideas, but several awkward or inaccurate expressions limit precision and naturalness. “Do their job or business” is an imprecise way to describe professional work, while “mother state” and “right to work on their own” do not express the intended ideas idiomatically. There are also collocation problems in phrases such as “adequate patients” and “serve to state's economic growth.” Aim for more precise professional and economic vocabulary, and check that words combine naturally in context. The meaning remains understandable, but more accurate phrasing would make the argument clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The essay includes both simple and complex sentence forms, such as the opening contrast between the two views and the sentence beginning “While working in the training country…”. Most sentences communicate their meaning, but some grammatical errors and punctuation problems remain. For example, “The Government had invested” uses an unsuitable tense for a general claim, and “the Government had invested a significant amount of money on their educational and academic institutions” has unclear reference and sentence construction. In “a clinic, that will adequate patients,” the relative clause is not formed correctly; “which will decrease unemployment rate” also needs an article. Commas are sometimes misplaced, as in “abroad ,” and “such as, doctors.” Review tense choice, articles, relative clauses and punctuation, while continuing to use varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.