Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Among many repected professions like doctors and engineering, practing is also part of their career.Some individuals think that they should work in same country where they studied, while other suggest that it should be their free will.I support that it should individual's choice to work where they think it suitable for them.

Practicing in a country where students complete their education is beneficial in a way that a person can practice while learning through internships.It might help in a way that they will be familiar with what to expect when they step up into their professional life and get easily connected with their work.

Meanwhile, people who chose to practice in different countries when stepping into caree,they might find it difficult to adapt into their new environmentand work culture, but it will help them to learn and have better exposure and gain better experience than people, who choose to study and work in same country.Furthermore, the international opportunities provides better salaries and life resources for individuals to work abroad.

In my conclusion, I believe choosing to work abroad is much more better option than working and studying in same country. It is good both financially and for professional development.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a clear opinion—that professionals should be free to work abroad—and include relevant points on both sides, such as familiarity gained by training and the benefits of international experience. However, the discussion is only partial: the case for requiring professionals to remain in the country where they trained is not fully explained, and the points about overseas work are asserted rather than supported with specific examples. The conclusion repeats your preference but does not add much reasoning. The response also falls short of the required 250 words, limiting how fully you can develop the arguments. To strengthen the response, explain why a country might expect graduates to serve locally, then support both views with a concrete example and a fuller explanation of your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph about working where one trained, a contrasting paragraph about working abroad, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Meanwhile” and “Furthermore” help signal the shift between ideas. Overall, the reader can follow your position and the main points. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes loose: the first body paragraph moves from internships to professional familiarity without clearly connecting the ideas, while the second combines adaptation, experience, salaries, and resources in one long sequence. Some references, such as “it” in “it will help them,” are not fully precise. Use clearer topic sentences and divide or sequence supporting points so each paragraph develops one main idea.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “internships,” “professional life,” “adapt,” “work culture,” “exposure,” and “professional development.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural combinations are noticeable, for example “repected,” “practing,” “environmentand,” “life resources,” and “much more better.” Some wording also makes the meaning less clear, such as “step up into their professional life.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, such as “enter professional practice” or “career opportunities.” Building a wider set of precise terms for public service, workforce shortages, and international employment would also help you explain both sides more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “where they studied” and a contrastive sentence beginning “Meanwhile.” The main meaning is generally understandable, but errors in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain. For example, “the international opportunities provides” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “I support that it should individual's choice” is missing grammatical elements. There are also punctuation and spacing problems, such as the run-on presentation around “career,they” and “environmentand.” Practise forming complete clauses and checking agreement and articles, then proofread punctuation and spacing. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.