Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is important for a professionals to work in their own coice of city. Working in different countries cause exploring of different enviroments which leads to gain knowledge, deal different kinds of persons and build a skill.

Some people think that doctors and engineers should do their training in the country where they learnt. Most probably, working in their own country could be beneficial for other people. Doctors can treat their own people and can make different developments according to their requirements in their own country which will be optimse the country' situation. Moreover, Engineers can also facilitate their own people while making vsrious types of projects.

Conversely, Some people believes that professionals can work in any country where they want. In this perspective, professionals can analyse diverse environments, learn different skills, and try to secure their future.

In my perspective, It is better for any professionals to do work in their own choice of country. Because i think that when exploring different countries, making relations with other people can enhance their knowledge and skill.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify both perspectives: professionals may benefit their home country, while working abroad can expose them to different environments and skills. Your own preference is also stated, particularly in the opening and final paragraphs. However, the discussion is only partial: the first view receives examples about treating local patients and building projects, but the case for freedom to work abroad is mostly asserted rather than explained. The opinion is also unclear because “their own choice of city” and “their own choice of country” do not establish whether you favour staying in the training country or choosing any country. The response is 75 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop reasons and examples. Explain both sides more fully and state a consistent position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding opinion. Connectors such as “Moreover” and “Conversely” help signal relationships between ideas. However, progression is limited: the opening introduces several benefits of working abroad, but the later paragraph on that view adds little explanation, and the conclusion repeats the general idea of gaining knowledge and skills. Some links are mechanical or unclear, especially “In my perspective” and the sentence beginning “Because,” which is separated from the claim it explains. Develop each paragraph around one clear point, use transitions that accurately show the relationship, and make the conclusion directly answer the question.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “professionals,” “diverse environments,” “developments,” and “projects,” and the reader can generally understand your main ideas. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which makes parts of the response awkward: “exploring of different environments,” “deal different kinds of persons,” and “facilitate their own people.” There are also spelling errors such as “coice,” “enviroments,” “optimse,” and “vsrious.” These issues make the expression less precise and can slow the reader. Build a wider set of natural phrases for discussing migration, public services, and professional development, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “the country where they learnt” and a sentence with coordinated actions: “professionals can analyse diverse environments, learn different skills, and try to secure their future.” However, the range remains limited, and frequent errors affect accuracy. Examples include the article and plural pattern in “a professionals,” subject–verb agreement in “Working in different countries cause,” and “Some people believes.” The fragment “Because i think…” is not correctly attached to the preceding sentence, and capitalisation of “Some,” “It,” and “i” is inconsistent. Practise accurate agreement, articles, and complete sentence construction before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.