Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued by some people that medical and engineering profesionsalas are worked in such countries where they did their experiencel. Meanwhile, other argue that they are free to work there they want to peroform their duties. However, I believe that they should perform their duties in native countries.

On the one hand, supporters of the idea doctors and engineers work in their home country believe that these both professions are the assest of country. As these both are professionals dirctly conected with the people emtions, like doctors connected with immuno compromised community and its necessary they can understand them well. Take the example of Germany, two professionals should be native to country like medical and engineerig because they think these are connected with people health and life so they should understand all situations according rules. Thus, the supporters of this view support their findings back their analysis with valid arguments.

While on the other hand, the advocates of the view that they should work independently believe by doing work independly they learn something better. As when they work independently they learn something new which is better for her future. For example, in Japan doctors and engineers are independent and they learn from best and perform best, after this these both professionals were cosidered the best in Japan. Hence, this view also carry a lot of weigtage.

However, in my opinion both these professionals shold work in their home country. As when they work in their own country so they don't have language barrier and they give their best in their own country.

To sum up, enen though working independently are good, but I believe that when these work form the country where they did their training they give their best.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state your own view: the opening and conclusion support professionals working in their home country, while the middle paragraphs present arguments for each position. This gives the response a relevant overall focus. However, the reasons are only partly developed. The claim that doctors and engineers are “assets” to their country is not clearly connected to why they must remain there, and the Germany example is difficult to follow. The opposing view—that working abroad helps professionals learn—is also asserted rather than explained or supported with a convincing example. To strengthen the response, explain the practical consequences of each position and make your examples specific and clearly relevant.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify the main stages of your argument, and signposts such as “On the one hand” and “To sum up” make the organisation visible. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, particularly in the first body paragraph, where the points about national assets, patients’ emotions, Germany, and regulations do not connect smoothly. Some linking is mechanical or repetitive, including “However,” “While on the other hand,” and “Hence.” Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the relationship between each reason and its example explicit. Clearer referencing would also help readers understand who “they” refers to in places.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “language barrier,” “independently,” “professionals,” and “supporters,” and you try to express ideas about national service and professional development. However, the range is limited and several spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “profesionalas,” “experiencel,” “assest,” and “weigtage”; phrases such as “work there they want to peroform their duties” and “connected with the people emtions” are also unnatural or unclear. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than using ambitious wording without control. Learning topic-specific phrases such as “practise in their home country” and “gain international experience” would help you express the argument more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and attempts at longer sentences with subordinate clauses, for example, “As when they work independently they learn something new.” This shows an effort to vary sentence structure. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning hard to follow. For instance, “other argue” needs a plural verb, while “these both are professionals” has an awkward determiner structure. The opening sentence, “medical and engineering profesionsalas are worked,” also has an incorrect passive construction. Practise building clear subject–verb sentences first, then add subordinate clauses with accurate punctuation and grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.