Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

FEW INDIVIDUALS OPINE THAT DOCTORS AND ENGINEERS SHOULD BE CONTRIBUTE THE NATION WHERE THEY COMPLETED THEIR STUDIES AND TRAINING, WHILE OTHER PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE THEIR OWN FREEDOME TO CHOOSE THEIR WORKING CONTRY. THE PROFESSIONALS ARE SAME AS OTHER HUMAN BEINGS, SO THEY MUST HAVE RIGHTS TO CHOOSE THE COUNTRY, WHERE THEY WANT PROVIDE SERVICE, WHILE HAVING THIS TYPE OF RESTRICTION CAN CREATE GLOBAL TENSION.

TO COMMENCE WITH, ONE OF THE MAIN REASON OF THIS BELIEVE IS TO PROTECT OUR HIGH SKILLED PROFESSIONALS TO MOVE ON FOREIGN COUNTIES. THE CONTRY SPEND LOT OF MONEY AND RESOURCES TO TRAIN AN EXPERT ENGINEER, SCIENTIST AND DOCTOR, BUT AFTER COMPLETING THEIR STUDIES GOES TO OTHER NATIONS FOR HIGH EARNING , THEN IT SHOULD BE BECAME A LOSE OF TIME AND RESOURCES. GOVERNMENT CAN STOP THAT EMIGRAT BY PROVIDE INFRASTRUCTURE AND SETTING INCLOME STANDARDS. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE SOME SCIENTIST MOVED TO OTHER COUNTRIES BEACUSE OF LAKING OF GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE SO, BY PROVIDE IT THE NUMBER OF EMIGRATS CAN REDUCE.

HOWEVER, PROFESSIONALS ARE HUMAN BEINGS AND ENTITLED TO PERSONAL CAREER FREEDOM. BY RESTRICT THEM, IT CONSIDER AS VIOLATION OF RIGHTS TO FREEDOM. IN SOME DEVELOPING NATIONS THERE IS A GAPS OR LACK OF SPECIALIZED TRAING PROGRAMS, FORCING STUDENT TO MIGRATE ABROAD TO GAIN PROPER KNOWLEDGE IN THAT FIELD. NEVERTHELESS, MANY OF THESE INDIVUDAL HAVE DESIRE TO EVENTUALLY RETURN AND SERVE THEIR HOME LAND BY APPLING THEIR EXPERTICE.

IN CONCLUSION, ALTHOUGH LOT OF PEOPLE MIGRATE TO ABROD FOR EARNING WELL, NATIONS HAVILY INVEST IN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CAN PREVENT THE GLOBAL MOBILITY. IN MY POINT OF VIEW, GOVERNEMNT SHOULD FOCUS ON CREATING ATTREATIVE FACILITIES AND BETTER WORKING ENVIRONMENT RATHER THAN IMPOSING STRCIT RESTRICTIONS.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and make your position clear: professionals should be free to choose where they work, while governments should improve local conditions rather than impose restrictions. The point that countries invest resources in training professionals is relevant, and you support the opposing view with the example of people leaving because of inadequate infrastructure. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others. The costs of training are mentioned, but the essay does not explain in detail why this investment should create an obligation to stay. The point about students migrating to gain specialist knowledge is also introduced without a specific example or fuller explanation. Develop these arguments with clearer reasoning and more concrete support.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph explaining the case for retaining trained professionals, a paragraph supporting freedom of movement, and a conclusion that restates your view. Linking phrases such as “To commence with,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the argument. At times, though, connections within paragraphs are mechanical or unclear. For example, the move from the cost of training to government action needs a more explicit explanation of how better infrastructure and pay address the concern. Some references, such as “it” in “then it should be became a lose,” are difficult to follow. Use clearer sentence links and refer to ideas with precise nouns rather than ambiguous pronouns.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “career freedom,” “specialized training programs,” “infrastructure,” and “working environment.” These choices show an effort to discuss professional migration and government policy. However, the range is limited by repeated or inaccurate wording, and several spelling and word-choice errors make parts of the argument difficult to read, such as “freedome,” “contr y,” “laking,” and “attreative.” Some combinations are also unnatural, including “contribute the nation” and “setting income standards.” Aim to learn accurate topic-specific collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise vocabulary would help express the ideas without relying on broad phrases such as “better working environment.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and attempts at complex structures, including a contrast with “while” and a concessive clause beginning “although.” This gives the response some variety, but errors in sentence construction and verb forms often make the meaning less clear. For example, “should be contribute” needs a correct verb pattern, and “after completing their studies goes to other nations” has an unclear subject and agreement. The sentence beginning “By restrict them” also needs a gerund after “by” and a complete, correctly formed main clause. Review subject–verb agreement, verb patterns, and sentence boundaries, then proofread each sentence for a clear subject and finite verb. This will make your complex ideas easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.