Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There is no denying the fact that imigration is tge dream of people while it is a commonly held belief that profisionals should be required to work in the country where they did their training,there is also an argument that believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.this essay will analyse this topic from both points of view and express mu opinion .

On one hand,some people believe that profisionals should work in the country where they were trained because gouvernement spend a lot of money and profisionals training and education.In other words,working in there country helps them to develope there country.

in addition encouraging professionals to remain in their home country can improve living conditions and benefit the whole population.

On the other hand,some people beilive that doctors and ingenier shoulde be free and go to work wherever they wants because he want to improve there skills so he should fo to work in good country who can helps him to develope there skils it is also possible to say that they go where he can to learn more .

moreover if they stay in there country they receive low salaries and have a limited career opportunities,for instance in algeria doctrors study 7years then when he start work they receive w low salaries like one who never study in university .

in conclusion,there are no easy answers to this question.On balance,however, i tend to believe that professionals need to go work in another country if they want because no one can know ur future better then you

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and give a clear preference in the conclusion: professionals should be able to work abroad. Relevant reasons include public investment in training, national development, better salaries, and career opportunities. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with specific examples, and the discussion of the benefits to the home country is brief. The opinion is also not fully developed: “no one can know ur future better then you” does not clearly explain why freedom to move should outweigh the country’s investment in training. The response is 239 words, so it does not meet the 250-word minimum; the 26 words copied from the task prompt are not counted. Develop each side with clearer reasoning and a relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “in conclusion” help signal the main stages, so the reader can follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several ideas run together in long sentences, particularly the explanation of why professionals may seek work abroad. Some linking is mechanical, while references such as “they,” “he,” and “there” make it unclear at times who or which country is meant. Use shorter, clearly punctuated sentences, group each reason with its explanation, and make pronoun references explicit to improve the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “professionals,” “training,” “education,” “living conditions,” “salaries,” and “career opportunities.” These terms help communicate the main arguments. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “work” and “country.” Frequent spelling errors, including “imigration,” “profisionals,” “gouvernement,” and “ingenier,” make the writing less clear and reduce the accuracy of the vocabulary. Some choices are also imprecise, such as “good country” and “develop their skills” without further detail. Build a bank of accurately spelled topic terms and use more precise alternatives, such as “employment opportunities” or “professional development,” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrastive opening and clauses introduced by “because” and “if.” This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and verb forms are frequent enough to make some passages difficult to follow. For example, “professionals should be free and go to work wherever they wants” shifts between plural and singular forms, while “they receive low salaries and have a limited career opportunities” has an agreement and article/plural problem. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and full stops. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using one clear subordinate clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.