Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctores and engineers, should be required to work in country where they did their training. while others argue that they should a freedon to work abroad. In my opinion, professionals should be free to choose where they want to work because this can provide them batter carrer opportunities and higher standard of living.

On the one hand, some individuals believe that professionals, sach as doctors and engineers, should work in in the country where they received trainning. the main reason is government spend large amount of money on these professionals like they provide free scolarships to many students soo goverment wants output from them. if the go to the abroad for theirs occupation government should suffer finically. For examples government want peoples stayed in their own country after graduction and should provide free medical services to local peoples. This can improve the health care system and benefit society as a whole.

On the other hand, others argue that professionals should be free to work in any country they shoose. This is because working abroad should them batter salaries, modren facilities and valuable experience. Moreover, they can improve theirs professional skill by working with experinced people who used advanced techonolgy. For example, doctores who work in in developed countries can gain valuable knowledge and improve theirs standard of living. Therefor, l believe that professionals should have freedom to choose theirs workplace according to their need and career goals.

In conculsion, although professionals should contribute to the development of the country where they received their trainning, I believe they should have freedom to work other countries because of batter carrer and higher standrad of living.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear opinion: professionals should be free to choose where they work. The reasons are relevant, including public investment in training and the benefits of overseas salaries, facilities, and experience. The response also includes examples, such as government-funded scholarships and doctors gaining knowledge abroad. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claim that governments would suffer financially if graduates leave could be developed by explaining the loss of publicly funded expertise or the effect on local services. The opposing view is also less fully explored than your own. To strengthen the response, extend each main reason with a clearer explanation and a specific, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your position. The contrastive signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand,” along with “Moreover” and “In conclusion,” help readers follow the progression. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some flexibility in linking ideas. However, connections within paragraphs are sometimes abrupt, and the repeated use of “because” and “for example” makes cohesion somewhat mechanical. Some references, such as “they” in the discussion of government spending, are not always immediately clear. Use a wider range of linking expressions and make the relationship between each claim and its explanation explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “scholarships,” “professional skills,” “advanced technology,” and “health care system.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less fluent, such as “doctores,” “trainning,” “batter,” and “standrad.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “they should a freedom” and “working abroad should them better salaries.” These errors can make the reader pause, even though the intended meaning is usually recoverable. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations as complete phrases, such as “offer higher salaries” and “receive professional training,” rather than translating word by word.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “people who used advanced technology” and a concession in the conclusion beginning “although.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but control is inconsistent: some sentence patterns are incomplete or faulty, as in “they should a freedom to work abroad” and “working abroad should them better salaries.” There are also errors in articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, for example “government spend large amount” and the lower-case “while” after a full stop. These issues sometimes make the reader work to interpret the sentence. Practise accurate subject–verb patterns and articles, and proofread each sentence for a complete subject and verb before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.