Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is a serious debate on that topic that the professionals like doctors, engineers etc are able to pursue their job or work in their country from where they complish their training while there are some other people who believe that this decision is depend on their own choice and we are not able to force them to stay. In this essay, we discuss the views and reasons on that topic and also share own idea.

Professional people are play important role in their country and they are the key of success for the country. They help their country from many ways, firstly they give or donate there knowledge to the citizens of their country and provide better education them. professional like engineers are able work in their own country because engineering is the field which is very demanding in the world and they help there country and also improve the structure on their country from their experience and work.

In stead of this all, the main thing that every person need is money. As we talk about a poor country which have not that much facilities, they give professionals less salary and because of this for better oppotunity they move on abroad which is quite good. They also go another countey to get best experience and knowledge because there are alot of countries which are highly qualify.

In conclusion, although requiring professionals to work in the country where they received their training can benefit that country, i believe they should be free to work abroad if they wish. This allow them to fin f bettter oppotunities, develop their careers, and use their skills where they are most needed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You present a clear opinion in the conclusion: professionals “should be free to work abroad if they wish,” and you give relevant reasons, including better pay, opportunities, and experience. You also explain why a country may want trained professionals to stay, mentioning their contribution to education and infrastructure. However, the two views are not developed evenly: the case for requiring professionals to remain is asserted rather than explored, and the benefits of migration are listed without a specific example or fuller explanation. The introduction says you will discuss both views, but the response would address the task more fully if each position had a developed paragraph and your opinion were explained consistently, not only stated clearly at the end.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two perspectives, and a conclusion that restates your position. This gives the reader a basic route through the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from professionals’ importance to education and then engineering without explaining the links between these points. Connectors such as “firstly,” “In stead of this all,” and “because of this” are either awkward or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas. Some references, such as “this decision,” are also broad. To improve, organise each body paragraph around one main claim, then explain and illustrate it, using linking phrases selectively and precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “professionals,” “salary,” “opportunity,” “experience,” and “skills,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning less clear. For example, “donate there knowledge” is not a natural way to describe professionals contributing expertise, and “highly qualify” does not express the intended idea correctly. Spelling errors such as “complish,” “oppotunity,” and “countey” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise set of phrases for discussing migration and public services, and check spelling and word forms carefully. This will help you express your relevant ideas more naturally and clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, including a contrast in the opening and a concession in the conclusion. However, errors are frequent, and some sentences are difficult to follow. Examples include “Professional people are play important role,” “this decision is depend,” and “they are able work,” where verb forms and sentence patterns are not controlled. There are also problems with agreement and articles, as in “a poor country which have not that much facilities,” and punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent. Practise building accurate basic clauses first, then combine them with controlled connectors such as “although” and “because.” Proofreading for subject–verb agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries would make your argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.