Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is debated all across the world that whether the people belonging to preofessional career such as doctors and engineers should work in the state where they got their qualification or ought to settle abroad to persue better career. A sinificant number of people put arguement before the world that these individuals must serve the nation which made them able to achieve the titles before their names. They argue that they have received their formal education and training in their native country and are completely aware of the needs and requirements of that particular territory so their service in that region would bring prosperity and they will help to boost the economy of that area. However, counter arguement is also there, the proponets of this arguement stress that the people should be free to deliever their services wherever they wish to, they must not be bounded to stay in the state where they got their training and should be allowed to shift to any country wherever they want.

From my perspective, the second argument has more weight. The professionals should not be compelled to live in a country where they recieved their formal education and training. If a particular country does not provide enough opportunities and chances for career growth and development, the people should migrate to other state which supports their professional and finicial stability. A person would work with heart and soul if he is mentally satisfied and relaxed, if the people are not happy with a state they live in and work in, they would not contibute much to the economy because they would struggle to work there. Moreover, the world is now interconnected technologically, if doctors and engineers move abroad, they may still be able to send remitances to their own country which will directly strenghten the economy of that area.

In conclusion, the doctors and engineers should decide on their own that where they want to provide their services either in the country where they acquired their traing or a foreign state. If these people wish to emigrate to another country, it has nothing to do with loss of their native nation. If they perform better at abroad, this would add to the global development and advancement. Moreover, due to evolving technology, it has now become possible to remain in touch with families even after staying abroad and to add to the financial situation of the own state. Thus, they should be motivated if they have made their mind to settle abroad.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and make your own position clear: you support professionals being free to work abroad. The first paragraph explains why trained professionals might serve their home country, while the later paragraphs develop personal opportunity, job satisfaction and possible remittances as reasons for allowing migration. These are relevant points, and the conclusion consistently reinforces your view. The response meets the task well, but the two sides are not developed equally: the case for staying is mostly presented as a summary of what supporters believe, with little specific illustration or consideration of its limits. Your argument for freedom is more developed, though the claim that remittances will strengthen the economy could be explained more carefully. A concrete example and fuller comparison would make the discussion more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall structure: it introduces the debate, presents the arguments for staying, states your opinion, and concludes by restating it. Paragraphing helps the reader follow this progression, and signposts such as “However,” “Moreover” and “In conclusion” make relationships between points visible. At times, though, cohesion feels mechanical because several transitions are used to announce points rather than connect their reasoning. The opening paragraph is especially dense, combining both sides in one long block, and the conclusion repeats ideas about technology and financial support already mentioned. Some references, such as “that area” and “these people,” could be more precise. Separate the opposing view into a clearer paragraph and use more explicit links between claims and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for the topic, including terms such as “career growth and development,” “professional stability,” “remittances” and “global development.” These choices help express the main ideas, and the meaning is generally clear. However, attempts at more formal or less common vocabulary sometimes lead to inaccurate spelling, word forms or collocations, including “preofessional,” “persue,” “deliever,” “bounded” and “at abroad.” Some phrases are also vague or unnatural, such as “put argument before the world” and “the financial situation of the own state.” These issues do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and naturalness. Prefer familiar, accurate academic phrasing, and check spelling and collocations carefully when using ambitious vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional sentences (“If a particular country does not provide enough opportunities…”) and clauses explaining reasons and results. This gives the response some variety, and the main message remains understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly in sentence boundaries and clause construction. For example, “A person would work with heart and soul if he is mentally satisfied and relaxed, if the people are not happy…” joins two complete ideas with a comma and shifts from singular to plural reference. The opening “It is debated… that whether” also uses an incorrect clause pattern, while “decide on their own that where” has an unnecessary “that.” Break long sentences into clearer units, check agreement and pronoun reference, and review punctuation around linked clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.