Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Few people suggest that professinoal workers such as doctors and engineers, should work in the country where they first completed there training while other suggest that they should be individually free to work where ever they want to .

There are different factors that whether the indvidual should work in the country where they are trained or they should be free to work in other countries . Acording to Natinoal Human Rights everyone has a freewill wether they its about there carrier or something else . Every person should have right o work freely .

Those people that believe that a professinoal should work in the country in which he completed his training, there point of view is like " This person did his professinoal training from our country and now he is moving abroad for his future job " .

Like if a person completed his training from his own home country and now he wishes to move abroad for his better future, there is nothing wrong with it beacouse everyone has right to live his right according to his options . But there is a valid point in this factor that he should also sense that if he did his training from his country then he should also serve his country .

But if an individual has done his training form abroad and now wishes to go back to his coutry to work for his homeland its also his choice .

In conclusion every person has right to live his life freely whether it's on job point of view or other important factors . It seriously depends on the person's own will .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You express a clear preference for professionals to choose where they work, especially in “every person has right to live his life freely.” You also acknowledge the opposing view by noting that someone trained in their home country “should also serve his country.” However, the discussion is only partial: the reasons for requiring professionals to remain are not explained, and the freedom argument is mostly repeated rather than supported with a developed example. The point about someone training abroad and returning home does not directly develop either side of the debate. To strengthen the response, explain the benefits and drawbacks of both positions, then support your own view with a specific example and maintain it consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic sequence: it introduces the issue, considers the expectation to serve the training country, and ends by restating personal choice. Paragraph breaks help separate some ideas. However, progression is limited, and several points repeat the same claim that people should be free to choose. Connections between ideas are sometimes unclear; for example, “But if an individual has done his training form abroad” introduces a new situation without showing how it supports the discussion. Linking phrases such as “According to” and “In conclusion” are used, but they do not create a fully developed argument. Organise the essay into distinct paragraphs for each view and your opinion, and use clear references and transitions to show how each point relates to the question.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “professional training,” “work,” “abroad,” and “future,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several expressions are repeated, particularly “right” and “work.” Frequent spelling errors, including “professinoal,” “indvidual,” and “Acording,” make the writing less clear and reduce the accuracy of word choice. Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “live his right according to his options.” Build a more precise set of topic-related expressions, such as “retain skilled workers,” “career opportunities,” and “contribute to the national workforce,” and check spelling carefully. This would help you express the competing arguments more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example beginning “if a person completed his training…” and a contrast introduced by “while.” However, the range is limited, and complex sentences are often faulty. For instance, “There are different factors that whether…” lacks a grammatical structure after “factors,” while “everyone has a freewill wether they its about…” is difficult to follow because of errors in clause construction and agreement. Articles and possessives are also inconsistent, as in “has right” and “there point of view.” These frequent errors can make the reader work to understand your meaning. Practise building accurate sentences with “whether,” “because,” and “although,” and check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.