Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The new trend of shifting towards overseas nations is quite popular among individuals. While some people think that skillful persons like doctor and engineers should resides in their home town and serve the nation, other feels that there should be no restrictions on working of citizens. In my opinion, they should work according to their convenince.
It is widely considered that if the professionals work in their own country, it will contribute towards the welfare of society and individual will also get motvation by seeing such skillful gentlemens. In addition, it shows their duties towards their country which accounts them as role models for young generation. For instance, a doctor has enough experience of his field, then he devotes his passion to his own state, it directly contruibutes to GDP as well as it enhances the per capita income.
In contrast, the crucial reason for professionals to work in another nations could be regarded as their comfort and ease. If an individual is not getting better pay for his work then he can plan to abroad for his better future. Furthermore, citizens have their right to freedom and no one has the power to bound them to work in a nation. Migration in search of better work opportunities leads to much better experience in their lives. From my perspective, it depends on person to person as well as current situation of an individual. However, professionals should work by examining the working conditions and their own comfort zones.
In conclusion, Untill and unless, the facilties and proper opportunities are not being provied, individuals will go for another states. Although it is quite difficult to settle their career in another location, the proffesional always looks for better chances
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both views: the first body paragraph argues that professionals can benefit their home country, while the next explains that they may seek better pay, freedom, and opportunities abroad. Your position is that the choice should depend on the individual’s circumstances, which is relevant, but it remains broad and is not consistently developed into a clear argument. For example, the claim that a doctor’s work raises GDP and per-capita income is asserted without explaining the link, and the point about professionals serving as role models is only briefly mentioned. The conclusion introduces limited facilities and opportunities as the reason people leave, but this could be connected more clearly to your earlier discussion. Develop each main reason with a specific explanation or example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Connectors such as “In addition,” “In contrast,” and “Furthermore” help signal relationships between ideas. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes uneven, and some links feel mechanical rather than showing precisely how one point follows another. For instance, the move from professionals’ duties to GDP and per-capita income is not fully explained, while the final sentence about settling a career abroad adds a point without clearly tying it to the conclusion. The reference in “it depends on person to person” is also vague. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each reason and its supporting explanation explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “welfare of society,” “role models,” “freedom,” and “work opportunities.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “contribute towards” and “working conditions.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, which makes some ideas less clear: “plan to abroad,” “bound them to work,” and “accounts them as role models” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “motvation,” “convenince,” and “proffesional” are noticeable, and some wording is repetitive. Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “move abroad,” “restrict their freedom,” and “regard them as role models,” and proofread spelling carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If an individual is not getting better pay…” and a contrastive opening with “While.” These attempts show some range, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction are frequent enough to make parts of the response difficult to follow. Examples include “doctor and engineers should resides,” “other feels,” and “the professional always looks,” where the subject and verb do not agree. The sentence beginning “For instance, a doctor has enough experience…” is also awkwardly constructed, and “Until and unless… are not being provided” uses a confusing negative structure. Practise checking each sentence’s subject and verb, and simplify complex sentences when you are unsure of the structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.